SASAC reports questioned Federation of Federations says central-enterprise tax is 5 times times less than private enterprises

Licensing new "Central-enterprise tax for private enterprises more than 5 times times" This month by the SASAC related reports provided by the experts questioned by the Federation.　　Yesterday, "The first financial daily" reporter obtained the National Federation Research Laboratory Experts completed a "state-owned and private enterprise development speed and benefits of the state of comparison" (hereinafter referred to as "comparison"), the central enterprise tax burden for privately-run enterprises less than 3 times times. According to the material, from the sales tax rate (the ratio of tax to the sales revenue), the central enterprises in 2009 9.09%, the national state-owned enterprises 9.42%;　　According to this calculation, the central-enterprise tax is only 2.34 times times the size of private enterprises, state-owned enterprises tax is 2.95 times times the size of the privately-run industrial enterprise. Data fight the above "central government tax for private enterprises 5 times times more", from the August Sasac issued the "State Council 2009 Years Review" (hereinafter referred to as "review"), the 66th page of the Chinese People's University of Finance and Finance Institute, said an unnamed study, 2003-2008 years,　　The tax burden of state-owned enterprises is much higher than that of other types of enterprises, the 6 annual average value of state-owned enterprise is 27.3%, which is 5.29 times times of the comprehensive average (5.16%). As soon as the conclusion was published, the social debate was aroused.　　So, about one months later, the Federation of the research experts also took out a related data comparison materials to explore the central enterprises, private enterprise tax burden topic. "I don't know how the 27.3% is calculated, and the data I've given here are real sources," he said.　　The research director, Chan, said.　　He introduced the data source of "comparison": Central enterprises and national State-owned enterprises data from the "review", private industrial enterprises data from the Bureau of Statistics, and the size of enterprises on the scale from the annual research report of the Federation. This reporter yesterday called the Renmin University of China Financial and financial institutions related people. Among them, the Institute's office staff indicated that, as the review cited the lack of additional information in the study, it was not possible to know the conclusions and sources of the study's specific researchers or data.　　Several professors at the academy also said in an interview that they were not responsible or knowledgeable about the study.　　Min, deputy Dean of the hospital, said that from the definition of "tax", the general can be divided into three kinds of caliber, that is, a company to pay taxes and the total income of the enterprise, gross output value or the overall increase in comparison, due to the different denominator, the researchers can be tailored to the needs of Andifu, director of Finance and Finance Department of the Institute, said that from the original intention of the study quoted in the review, it should be to prove that the state-owned enterprises have higher taxes than private enterprises. Andifu said: "The state-owned enterprises should have a higher tax burden, because its profits, this is normal."　　Andifu also said that from the point of view of the definition of tax burden, it is not likely that the special income or profits turned over by the central enterprises should be counted into the tax-bearing elements. In other words, the people's University of Research and the research of federations of experts, the tax should be the same, outThe difference is probably in the denominator.　　But because it is not the head of the study cited in the review, two people's Congress professors say only the specific person responsible can explain the number of "fights".　　The tax burden of private enterprises is increasing year in fact, before this, "The Crystal newspaper" in April this year reported that, in terms of income tax, all the domestic a-share listed companies, private enterprises tax is 24%, state-owned enterprises are 10%, the private enterprise tax burden is significantly higher than state-owned enterprises.　　But Chan told the newspaper reporter, from the "2009 Tax Yearbook", from cigarettes, telecommunications, crude oil, oil, electricity and other monopolistic industries to pay the income tax is not high, for hundreds of billions, but these industries turned over the industrial value-added tax and commercial value-added tax is as high as 700 billion, is a monopoly of central enterprises of the main tax.　　From the figures provided in the review, 2009, the central enterprise tax 1.15 trillion yuan, and the tax yearbook figures show that the monopoly industry contributed to the majority of the tax.　　However, Chan added, because the tax yearbook to the industry to divide the tax source, do not exclude these industries have a very small number of private enterprises to contribute tax, but because these industries are monopolistic industries, the central enterprises in these industries contribute to the source of more than 90%.　　In other words, in the 1.15 trillion tax paid by the central enterprise, only the above 5 enterprises, the contribution of the tax on at least more than 700 billion, the monopoly of central Enterprises is the main force to pay taxes, it is not difficult to explain why the tax burden of the central enterprises than the average tax of private companies higher. "Monopolistic industries have already implemented higher tax rates," he said.　　"Chan that the monopoly enterprise occupies the monopoly, it is a very normal policy choice to levy a higher tax rate to balance."　　In "comparison", the Department of Industry and Commerce also gave more comparative data, from several enterprises "hematopoietic" indicators, for example, the unit assets tax contribution rate, 2009, the Central Enterprise for 5.45%, on the scale of private enterprises for 5.28%, the gap between the two. From the cost profit margin, that is, the total profit of the enterprise and the total cost, the ratio of state-owned and holding enterprises above the size of 2005 fell from 8.44% to 2008 years of 6.71%, while the private industrial enterprises above the scale rose from 4.93% in 2005 to 2008 years of 6.87%, Already surpassed the former.