Taiwan general election and SEO

What is the relationship between Taiwan's general election and SEO? Not directly related. But the election of Taiwan the day before yesterday, let me feel something connected. For example, the collective wisdom of the power of understanding.

In Taiwan's 22nd election, Mr Ma won Mr Hsieh by more than 2 million votes. The vast majority of people did not anticipate the big lead. This kind of victory situation and before the election on the table can see the news can be completely different.

My wife and I have always been particularly fond of watching Taiwan's political and http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/29633.html "" "variety shows, so they have been watching Taiwan elections. Nearly one or two months, in the news of the most Huan, is basically the adverse attacks on Mr Ma and rumors, such as green card problems, a market, the wife of the university when stealing newspapers and so on. Although these are almost no evidence, or simply nonsense, but the opponents keep saying, keep saying, has occupied the news subject. In the end, it seems to be unclear whether Mr Ma has had the greatest advantage a few months ago. Have you been chased 50 to 50?

As a result of the 22nd ballot, nearly a two-month flood of news and the choice of tens of millions of voters, a difference of 108,000.

Usually do not see these ordinary people have any opinion, most of them are silent, invisible, there is no specific perceptual knowledge of the collective existence. The hot news that can be seen on the Mesa often can't affect this collective.

When enough people are involved, they show an intangible collective intellectual power. This invisible collective power is not easily manipulated, and often proves that the invisible populace will make a relatively correct choice.

Mr Ma can win for the simple reason that Chen Shui-bian is too bad. No matter how political figures stir, the public is not a fool and will naturally make the right choice. (not to mention exceptions, such as Germany before World War Ii. ）

This is like Wikipedia. If Wikipedia is only open to a small number of users, it can be imagined that Wikipedia entries will be much less accurate because there is no way to control selfish cheating. But when the user group reaches millions of tens of millions of, the invisible collective wisdom shows strength. Although Wikipedia also has a lot of inaccurate, even wrong entries, but generally can maintain a generally acceptable level.

Seeing the thrilling election in Taiwan, you can see why search engines now have to consider social networking data. Although each single person's opinion may be biased and even cheating. But when the number of participating users is huge, the overall effect and the truth are often pretty. The Invisible Collective will eventually make corrections to individual opinions. Any personal manipulation, like the bouncing of some political figures on the table, even if it attracts the attention of the media, seems to lead the trend, but also disappears in the collective wisdom, can not change the direction of huge data.

If the collective wisdom of a certain thing, such as the judgment of a website, can achieve the correct rate of 60% or 70%, which is undoubtedly a great help to search engine algorithm.

Author: Zac@seo Every day
Original download: New virtual Host