The New York Times's description of Alibaba does not agree

Through "shareholder analysis", Alibaba will soon be listed in the United States as a politically motivated gold-digger. Alibaba issued a statement on the same day, expressing "strong opposition" to the New York Times article and the repeated "repeated episodes" of the media about it.

Alibaba pointed out that the New York Times made a "false description and a clear inference of personal tendencies." The statement stressed that Alibaba's only background is only the market. Alibaba said that it has "never had, no now, no future needs" for the various "backgrounds" imposed on the company by the outside world.

The statement added: "We understand the customary skepticism and judgment of individual international media about Chinese society and enterprises. However, today, the global community is beginning to adapt to the fact that China can and has been born into a group of markets that grow and fully serve the market The international large-scale enterprises. "

Alibaba will be listed in the United States, some analysts predict it will staged the history of the largest IPO. The opinion of the American media is very complicated. When the New York Times published the heavy essay on "smearing red" Alibaba, it is hard to convince people that its motive is simple and has no connection with the complex mentality of American society.

Marketization is the innate nature of Alibaba. As it moves toward the forefront of China's market economy, it has become almost a measure of the degree of marketization in China. Mutual participation of state-owned companies and private-owned enterprises is a new development in China's market-oriented process and also a dynamic process.

The achievements of Alibaba have caused some western discontent precisely because it represents China's marketization direction and demonstrates the astonishing potential of market elements in the Chinese economy. If Alibaba really started from China's old set and maintained its rise, it would not be terrible for the western electricity suppliers. Its competitiveness as an Internet company is built on the sand.

However, Alibaba has leveraged the thorough market attributes to mobilize Chinese society and set the confidence of the Chinese public and investors at large. China's market system is not designed from the top down, it is the result of numerous business exploration, practice. Alibaba is undoubtedly one of the most prominent beach-goers in the market-based torrent, which has become its gold-swapping advantage, and indeed it is neither necessary nor worthwhile to change its own core attribute.

The New York Times has deep-rooted stereotypes about Chinese and Chinese businesses and this is a problem for the entire Western world. China's most market-oriented Huawei, ZTE and other large enterprises have been subject to unceremonious criticisms and criticisms from the U.S. government and public opinion. The United States often singles out an element from Chinese enterprises and amplifies its meaning. They often appear to be "politically superior" to the Chinese people.

China's excellent and mainstream things have frequently been ruined in the West, and Alibaba is now even on the turn. What has always been sought after by Western media is probably only the anti-mainstream or extreme and marginalized people and things in Chinese society. This is really regrettable.

I hope that Chinese enterprises and Chinese will not have to be overly concerned with the coverage of Western media and will affect their own progress. Breaking the world has to deal with the complexities of Western public opinion, bearing in mind that some of their misconceptions and stereotypes about China have been put on their heads. The more China moves forward, the more it can find some problems and defects in Western society. The accumulation of experience in overcoming similar problems is a required course for the further internationalization of China's market-oriented corporations.