UK veteran PC player "StarCraft 2"

With the launch of StarCraft 2, more and more players are experiencing this work, and there are a lot of different voices in the comments about it, some people say it's a failed work, and some people criticize it as a bad game.　　The following from hooked game, a senior UK PC Gamer Chriscapel, expressed his own dissatisfaction with StarCraft 2, although it was his personal opinion, but perhaps some of his views could explain some of the reasons why StarCraft 2 was underperforming in the UK.　　The price is too high to buy Chriscape says 59.99 dollar pricing is significantly too high for PC games, this is consistent with the price of host games, and host game price is high because some of the game revenue belongs to the host manufacturer, not the game developers, and for PC games, such a high price can only explain the game as a developer of blizzard greed.　　This is even more pronounced in Britain, where retail prices are 5 pounds more expensive than other games. On the other hand, the purchase of the game is very inconvenient, Chriscape purchase other PC games are accustomed to steam and other digital download platform, and "Star 2" not only physical shop supply shortage, and digital downloads can only be downloaded in Blizzard official website, which makes accustomed to steam purchase game players feel quite inconvenient.　　This has to make people feel that Blizzard has a monopoly suspicion. War network and real-name System Chriscape said blizzard cancellation of the real-name system is wise, but the system is still a network of people feel is not very convenient, although this is not mandatory.　　In particular, some people are very care about winning and losing players will send you emails from time to time, which is unbearable.　　At the same time, the network blocked all other online methods, so that players can only use Blizzard's official network, forcing players to log on the network to play the game is also let Chriscape feel unacceptable.　　Burn the video card I heard Blizzard will provide patches to improve the problem, but before Blizzard solves the problem perfectly, it's a scary thing for many players. Non-interested units and multiplayer patterns Chriscape says he never plays Protoss because he doesn't like to study those units, the void ship? What's this for?　　Or tanks, Marines, Thor can make people know exactly what they are used for. Although he knew that many people would not agree with him, he maintained his opinion that he did not like the multiplayer mode unless he was playing with his friends.　　He didn't like the ladder pattern very much. Can only experience 1/3 of the content of "star 2" the single plot is quite grand, Chriscape very like this story and campaign design, but let him unhappy is only the plot of mankind, this is too thin, like the "Command and Conquer 3" plot is quite complete, the same as 3 of the "Quality Effect" series also than the " The story of Star 2 is much more complete.