Asp.net Cache vs memcached

I. Environment Server: IBM X365 M3 8 Core 8G RAMOS: windows server 2008 r2 & Hyper-V + CentOS 6.2 ii. Code (1) Subject code, easy to read: [csharp] SqlDataAdapter DataAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter (); SqlConnection Conn = new SqlConnection (DataConn); Conn. open (); SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand (SQL, Conn); DataAdapter. selectCommand = myCommand; DataAdapter. fill (ds); Conn. close () (2) Memcached (Client: BeITMemcached) [csharp] cache. sendReceiv ETimeout = 5000; cache. minPoolSize = 2; cache. maxPoolSize = 5; string cached_dt = cache. get (key) as string; if (cached_dt = null) {// subject code string str_dt = DataTableXml. serializeDataTableXml (ds. tables [0]); cache. set (key, str_dt, 30);} else {ds. tables. add (DataTableXml. deserializeDataTable (cached_dt);} (3) Asp.net Cache [csharp] view plaincopyif (HttpContext. current. cache [key] = null) {// subject code Http Context. current. cache. insert (key, ds, null, DateTime. now. addSeconds (30), System. web. caching. cache. noSlidingExpiration);} else {ds = (DataSet) HttpContext. current. cache [key];} III. Test Tool and parameter AB-t 30-c 50 192.168.0.226/t. aspx Description: t. aspx page reads Dataset 24 times, for (int I = 1; I <= 24; I ++) 4. Result (1) MemcachedRequests per second: 293.53 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 170.343 [MS] (mean) (2) Asp.net CacheRequests per second: 2408.06 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 20.764 [MS] (mean) v. Conclusion Memcached may have a high performance loss compared with LocalCache in Object serialization and network! Reference: Cache Type Cache Gets/sec Array Cache 365000APC Cache 98000 File Cache 27000 Memcached Cache (TCP/IP) 12200 MySQL Query Cache (TCP/IP) 9900 MySQL Query Cache (Unix Socket) 13500 Selecting from table (TCP/IP) 5100 Selecting from table (Unix Socket) 7400