Comparison between the four major Linux versions __linux

In this article I'll compare the four major Linux versions--debian,mandrake,red Hat, and suse-and discuss how to develop a standard for choosing a Linux version for a particular business environment.

It is difficult to choose a version that fits a particular environment from a large number of Linux versions. Each version has its own focus, a set of its own files, installation methods and their own version of the Linux kernel. In this article I'll compare the four major Linux versions--debian,mandrake,red Hat, and suse-and discuss how to develop a standard for choosing a Linux version for a particular business environment.
　　
　　 Debian
Debian Project was born on August 13, 1993, and its goal is to provide a stable, fault-tolerant version of Linux. It's not a company that supports Debian, it's a lot of developers who have invested a lot of time in their improvements, which draws on the experience of early Linux. Debian is known for its stability, although earlier versions of Slink have some problems, but its existing version of potato is fairly stable. This version uses more pluggable authentication modules (PAM) and combines some of the more manageable software (such as Winbind for Samba).
　　
The installation of Debian is entirely text-based, which is not a bad thing for itself. But this is not the case for novice users. Because it uses FDISK only as a partitioning tool without automatic partitioning, its disk partitioning process is very annoying.
　　
After the disk is set up, the selection of the Software toolkit is implemented through a tool called Dselect, but it does not provide users with easy setup steps for installing basic tool groups such as development tools.
　　
Finally, you need to configure X Windows with the anxious tool, which is similar to other versions of the X Windows configuration process. After you complete these configurations, Debian is ready to use.
　　
Debian provides technical support primarily through web-based forums and mailing lists. As a server platform, Debian provides a stable environment. To ensure its stability, developers will not be able to add new technology, but through multiple tests before selecting the right technology to join. One thing to note is that its current version uses a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4 kernel. Most system administrators focus on the stability of the server environment, which is exactly what Debian offers. However, since the 2.4 kernel has a lot of new features that are not available in the 2.2 kernel, I think that using the 2.2 kernel is a flaw in Debian, and that a less-friendly partition setting is a drawback.
　　
Finally, I gave Debian 7 points (scores from 1 to 10).
　　
　　 Mandrake
The publisher of Mandrakesoft,linux Mandrake, founded in 1998 by a group of Linux-respected groups, aims to make the work as simple as possible. Ultimately, Mandrake provides an excellent graphical installation interface, and its latest version includes many Linux packages.
　　
As a branch of Red Hat Linux, Mandrake is positioning itself on the best Linux version of the desktop market. But the company still supports installation on the server, and the results are not bad.
　　
The Mandrake installation is simple and straightforward, setting simple installation options for novice users. It fully uses the GUI interface and makes a simple GUI interface for disk partitions for each user. The selection of packages is very standard, and there are also options for software groups and individual toolkits. After installation, the user only needs to reboot the system and login to enter.
　　
Mandrake provides technical support primarily through mailing lists and Mandrak's own web forums. Mandrak is a great choice for desktop users, and it can also serve as a good server system, especially for novice Linux users. It uses the latest version of the kernel and has many software-databases and Web servers-that users need to use in a Linux server environment.
　　
Mandrak has no major software flaws, but it focuses more on the desktop market and less on the server market. Because this article is a discussion of the server system version of the article, so this is a flaw.
　　
I also give this version 7 points.
　　
　　 Red Hat Linux
Perhaps this is the most famous version of Linux, Red Hat Linux has created its own brand, more and more people have heard of it. Red Hat started its business in 1994 years, employing more than 500 people worldwide who are committed to an open source code system.
　　
Red Hat Linux is the best performing server in the public environment. It has its own company and can provide users with a complete set of services, making it particularly suitable for use in public networks. This version of Linux also uses the latest kernel, as well as the bulk package that most people need to use. The installation process for Red Hat Linux is also simple and straightforward. Its graphical installation process provides easy setup of all information about the server. The disk partitioning process can be done automatically, and the GUI tool can be selected, even if it is simple for the Linux novice. The process of selecting a package is similar to that of other versions, where users can choose a package type or a special package. When the system is up and running, users can get full technical support from the Web site and Red Hat.

I found Red hat to be an optimal version that meets the needs of the public. It works well in both the server and desktop systems. The only flaw in Red hat is that it has some non-standard kernel patches, making it difficult to tailor it to the needs of the user.
　　
Red Hat offers a wide range of technical support through forums and mailing lists, as well as its own company's telephone technical support, which is more attractive to group customers who require higher-tech support levels.
　　
I'll give it 9 points.
　　
　　 SuSE
Headquartered in Germany, SuSE AG has struggled for more than 8 years in the business world, and has been working to create the best Linux version to connect to the database. To achieve this, SUSE works with Oracle and IBM to keep their products working stably. SuSE also developed SuSE Linux email Server III, a very stable email group application.
　　
SuSE 7.3, based on the 2.4.10 kernel, improves ease of use based on the original version. The installation process is done through the GUI and the disk partitioning process is simple, but it does not provide users with more control and choice.
　　
Windows disks are easily accessible under the SUSE operating system, making it easier to switch between the two platforms and to start with a dual system. SuSE hardware detection is excellent, and this version is used very well on both the server and workstation.
　　
SuSE has an interface-friendly installation process, as well as a graphical management tool that makes it easy to access Windows disks, and is also convenient for end users and administrators, making it a powerful server platform.
　　
SUSE also provides technical support through a web-based forum, and I also find that it has phone support.
　　
I also give it 9 points.
　　
　　 Concluding remarks
　　
Linux servers are now popular with companies because they are cheap and can support a wide range of services, so this is likely to continue. In my environment, I used the Red Hat server, and I value it for its excellent technical support and extensive application. However, those who require high system stability should consider Debian; users who are unfamiliar with Linux should choose Mandrake; users who need to use database Advanced services and e-mail network applications should choose SuSE.
　　
　　 Select the server version to use and building the environment is an important step in the work. I hope this article can help users to clarify their own requirements, the best choice.