Comparison of text fields in mssql 0.3 million data searches

Database:
0.3 million, with an ID column but no primary key, a non-clustered index is created on the "category" field to be searched
Process T-SQL:
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
/*
User-Defined Function: the execution time is around-milliseconds.
Create function [dbo]. [gethl] (@ types nvarchar (4 ))
RETURNS table
Return select title from 0.3 million articles of the book Where classification Like '%' + @ types + '%'
Stored Procedure:
Create procedure [dbo]. [getfl] (@ typen nvarchar (4 ))
AS
Select the title from the book's 0.3 million Where categories Like '%' + @ typen + '%'
*/


Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
Declare @ a datetime, @ B nvarchar (4)
Set @ a = getDate ()
Select the title from the book's 0.3 million Where categories Like '% medical %' -- the "category" column has non-clustered indexes, which is a little faster than clustered index 1150 and takes about 1100 of the execution time.
-- Select from gethl ('medical ') -- using a user-defined function, the efficiency is the same as building a clustered index. It is a little slower than 1150-1200.
-- Execute getfl 'medical '-- the Stored Procedure Call cannot contain the parameter Execute getfl ('medical') in parentheses ')
-- Select title from VIEW1 -- View
Print 'runtime:
Print datediff (MS, @ a, getDate ())


Conclusion:
1. The above features include direct query, functions, views, and stored procedures;
2. In this text field, non-clustering is better than clustered index.
A better way is to create a search ID on another table, which is faster!