Difference and choice between SQL Server and Oracle!

SQL is suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (easy-to-use and low-cost). However, SQL does not support large data volumes, such as telecommunications data. But it is enough for medium and small enterprises. In non-Telecom and bank-level comparisons: SQL Performance is sometimes better than oracle .)

Oracle is inferior to SQL in terms of ease of use and maintenance cost, but it supports a large amount of data Good SQL. They have their own customer groups and are not comparable. Select the best option as needed. Regarding the performance comparison between sql2005 and Oracle 11g, Oracle's "soft paper"-disguised advertisement of the internal server, there is no need to think about anything. there is no choice, but when the database is less than 200 GB, we can consider that, for example, we basically cannot use SQL, one reason is that our database is at least GB, besides, the differences between the X86 platform hardware and power5 and power6 are still far from andzen1a46895. E dba's price gap shows the product gap. Most of our Oracle DBA's friends generally have a monthly salary of 8 K-20 K, excluding the bonus, however, most of those who are engaged in SQL DBA work are less than 7 K. I used to be a small soldier with a shabby SQL salary. IT experts posted on: Please enter comments IT experts posted on: I think it is obviously wrong to say this without sqlserver. I think it is enough for small and medium-sized enterprises to use sqlserver. If it is useless, your technology is not enough, now the technology is growing, I think oracle is just a moment of strong IT expert network users published: is obviously for SQL Server advertising http://four-corner.appspot.com/