Does anyone think MongoDB is much like a text cache, and why do people use MongoDB to store data instead of using text cache data?

Problem Refinement:
1. I think MongoDB is very much like the text cache, the function is very similar, do you think my opinion is correct?
2. Why do people prefer to use MONGODB to store data instead of text or memcache?
3.MongoDB is the best application scenario really a data warehouse? Where is the future of it?

Reply content:

Problem Refinement:
1. I think MongoDB is very much like the text cache, the function is very similar, do you think my opinion is correct?
2. Why do people prefer to use MONGODB to store data instead of text or memcache?
3.MongoDB is the best application scenario really a data warehouse? Where is the future of it?

Because MongoDB somehow still has half a db appearance, can let you engage in various index and query. And the data structure is still tree-like, index can build into sub-nodes inside, more convenient. Some caching services are basically accessible only with key. However, should not be because of this feeling that the relational database can be discarded, this depends on your specific business logic. If you need to join and need transaction, you will still encounter many obstacles in using MongoDB.

Personally think MongoDB can Query support for multiple data types embedded document and list these are very useful

Mongodd and Gridfs, it's a nice thing to do.

Not very familiar with Data Warehouse

