If you are experienced in CMS development, do you want to split the content table into the master table and the Appendix? someone gave me a suggestion today. we recommend that you split the data table into two tables: the content table and the master table, what are the benefits of doing so? I have seen some CMS do this. ------ Solution ------------------ easy to expand and maintain in the later stage. Easy to modify. ------ Solution ------------------ the main table has a great deal of experience in developing CMS for the subsequent multi-statement presentation. should the content table be divided into the main table and the attached table?
Someone gave me a suggestion today. we recommend that you split a data table into two tables in the master table. What are the advantages of this solution? I have seen some CMS do this.
------ Solution --------------------
It is easy to expand and maintain in the future. Easy to modify.
------ Solution --------------------
The main appendix provides great help for later releases !!!
------ Solution --------------------
It is necessary to have a large data scale.
This is a simple vertical table shard, which has some benefits. More data is saved on the unit Data page to reduce IO throughput.
------ Solution --------------------
It is recommended that the primary table and the attached table be highly efficient.
