What kind of mentality does outsourcing Android Developers use the 1.6 firmware?

A project is outsourced to an external company. What is developed is really ugly, and the 1.6 firmware is used. How can we refute their technical strength? A project is outsourced to an external company, what I developed is really ugly. How can I refute their technical strength when I use the 1.6 firmware?

Reply content:

How can we refute the technical strength of a project outsourced to external companies?

Because I am used to it, because I don't want to learn new ones (even if it's just a new interface), because I don't want to spend time upgrading, because they didn't maintain them later, because only one version can be displayed to the customer.

Sorry, I only read the title. If I want to refute the technical strength of others, it would be easier to come up with a similar product.

Full compatibility ~ It's just like using table to write proportional la S. It's nice ~ Simple implementation ~

Outsourcing will always only provide you with functions and do not provide you with aesthetic feelings. To be a public-oriented product, please never skip outsourcing.