I see Pauling commentary Nanyi's "JavaScript operating mechanism in detail: Another talk about event Loop"

Nanyi and Pauling to me are Daniel, they both books I have bought, Ruan Teacher's translation "software Caprice" and Pauling's "in layman node. js". It's been 4 months, so I should have no problem with it.

This is the case, Nanyi wrote an article on his blog, "JavaScript operation mechanism in detail: again on the event Loop", then Pauling saw, found a lot of problems, and then wrote an article in the impression notes "[Pauling commentary]javascript Operating mechanism in detail: again on the event Loop, because the impression note is now inaccessible (too rotten), found two cottage address is:

Http://www.360doc.com/content/14/1011/13/15077656_416048738.shtml

http://blog.csdn.net/lin_credible/article/details/40143961

Teacher Ruan's original text: http://www.ruanyifeng.com/blog/2014/10/event-loop.html

After reading my feeling is:

1. Do not worship Daniel too much, and read technical articles with suspicion.

2, someone else's article is wrong, Patience pointed out that the mistake is, do not say what "equivalent of fart", "pure nonsense", this is not Daniel's;

3, if you want to study the article, it is best to find experts to write, if not study just look, that does not matter; Nanyi's specialty is in fact translation, learned, Pauling's specialty lies in JavaScript, Nodejs, so Nanyi wrote a JS article let Pauling to find the wrong, If Pauling can't find out, I'm sorry I bought your book.

4, but I understand Pauling's mood, because the teacher Ruan as a huge number of readers, a little bit of error will be magnified many times, so he did not strongly pointed out, may not achieve the purpose of correcting;

5. Finally, I think they are both right, with different specialties, different language rigor, different audiences.

I had an agile training at the company last month, and I took out a PPT from a former colleague who was trained in the company to find out n errors to tell you. My behavior is similar to Pauling, anything you are familiar with, you will find that some of the previous understandings are wrong (including yourself or others), without it, patient and gentle correction can be.

The source of this article: Http://blog.csdn.net/ouyida3

2015.2.19

I see Pauling commentary Nanyi's "JavaScript operating mechanism in detail: Another talk about event Loop"