Java Next:groovy, Scala, or Clojure?

java Next Generation: Choose your next JVM language if any Java next-generation language is appropriate for your next-generation language, how would you choose? This article investigates the various factors that will have an impact on this important decision.

java Next generation: Overcoming synonyms interferes with the previous Java Next Generation article ("Functional Coding style") contrasts and compares the functional coding styles in Scala, Groovy, and Clojure. In this article, the series writer, Neal Ford, will delve deeper into the filtering, mapping, and reduction (reduce) capabilities in the next generation of Java languages. A series of short coding examples are provided to help you sort out the confusing differences in the way these 3 languages name these important functional structures.

Java Next Generation: No extension of inheritance, part 2nd The Java language is constrained by the inherent limitations of the extension mechanism, relying primarily on inheritance and interfaces. Groovy, Scala, and Clojure offer many other extension alternatives. This article explores further how Clojure uses the protocol as an extension mechanism.

Java Next Generation: No extension of inheritance, part 1th Groovy, Scala, and Clojure provide many extensibility mechanisms, but inheritance is almost the only choice for the Java language. This installment introduces category classes, Expandometaclass, implicit conversions, and protocols to extend Java classes using the Java.next language.

Java Next Generation: Groovy, Scala, and Clojure This article opens up a new Neal Ford DeveloperWorks series that provides a deep comparison of the three next-generation JVM languages: Groovy, Scala, and Clo Jure In part 1th, you will learn about similarities and differences in these languages, regardless of whether you continue to choose Java as the primary programming language.

Java Next Generation: The common denominator in Groovy, Scala, and Clojure, part 3rd This article is the last of a series of three-part articles that introduce the common denominator of Clojure, Scala, and Groovy, investigating how these languages handle exceptions, table Reach and null--These are the things that are prone to problems in the Java language. Each java Next Generation language eliminates the flaws in the Java language by highlighting the unique implementation of language features.

the next generation of Java: Memory and functional collaboration Scala and Clojure are functional languages, and Groovy includes many function features through libraries. This next generation of Java articles will explore how to implement memory in the Java Next generation language and how to use function composition features for simplicity.

java Next generation: using Java 8 as the Java Next generation language this next generation of Java articles will investigate to see if the Java 8 version is a reasonable candidate for your next programming language. This article describes how the lambda code block and the streaming API upgrade Java to a modern language.

Java Next Generation: mixing and characterization The main paradigm of the Java language (object-oriented and single-inheritance) effectively simulates most programming problems (but not all programming problems). Java's next generation languages extend this paradigm in a variety of ways, including mixing (Mixin) and features (trait). This edition of the Java Next Generation article defines the mechanisms that blend and features share, and explores in depth the nuances of mixing in Groovy and features in Scala.

java Next Generation: Functional coding style all Java next-generation languages include functional programming constructs that allow you to think about problems from a higher level of abstraction. However, the differences between language terms make it difficult to see similar structures. This article will show how common functional programming structures are represented in the next generation of Java languages, pointing out some nuances in the implementation details of those features.

java Next generation: Contrast concurrency Perhaps the most obvious difference between Java's next-generation languages is threading, concurrency, and parallelism. This article will cover some simple ways to parallelize existing function code in Scala, Groovy, and Clojure, and then analyze the actor concurrency model in Scala.

java Next Generation: local and partial applications all Java next-generation languages include local application (currying) and partial applications, but implement them in different ways. This article describes the two technologies and their differences, and shows their implementation details (and practical applications) in Scala, Groovy, and Clojure.

Java Next generation: the common denominator in Groovy, Scala, and Clojure, and the 2nd part of Java language-related complaints include that simple tasks involve too many steps, and the default settings are sometimes difficult to understand. All 3 Java next-generation languages have taken a smarter approach in these areas. This next generation of Java shows how Groovy, Scala, and Clojure can eliminate the flaws in the Java language.

Java Next Generation: concurrency in Clojure Clojure has the most aggressive concurrency method in all Java next-generation languages. This issue will delve into some aspects of concurrency in Clojure, including the epochal time model and software transaction memory.

Java Next Generation: The common denominator in Groovy, Scala, and Clojure, part 1th Java's Next Generation languages (Groovy, Scala, and Clojure) have more in common than different points, focusing on many features and conveniences in common. This issue explores how they can overcome one of the long-term drawbacks of the Java language-the inability to overload the operators. Related concepts such as relevance and prioritization are also discussed.

Java Next Generation: No extension of inheritance, part 3rd Java's next Generation languages (Groovy, Scala, and Clojure) compensate for the extended limitations of the Java language in several ways. The next generation of Java articles in this issue will introduce some of the surprising extensions that can be provided by Groovy's meta-programming tools.

Functional thinking: Rethinking scheduling (Dispatch) The next generation of languages for the Java platform provides a more flexible method scheduling mechanism than the Java language. In this issue of "functional thinking", Neal Ford will explore the scheduling mechanisms in functional languages like Scala and Clojure to show new ways of thinking about executing code.

Introduction to Service Data Objects If you think the Java EE programming model and API are forcing developers to waste too much time on technology-specific configuration, programming, and debugging, you are welcome to read this article. Many Java developers are skeptical about how to access heterogeneous data in a uniform way and are disappointed with the various programming frameworks that are proposed to address this problem. In this article, Java developer Bertrand Portier and Frank Budinsky will introduce next-generation data programming using service object Data (SDO).

Functional thinking: Functional design Patterns, part 3rd Gang of four's interpreter design pattern (interpreter style) encourages the creation of a new language based on a language to enable expansion. Most functional languages enable you to extend the language in many ways, such as operator overloading and pattern matching. Although Java does not support these technologies, the next-generation JVM language evenly supports these technologies, but its specific implementation details differ. In this article, Neal Ford will explore how Groovy, Scala, and Clojure can achieve the purpose of an interpreter design pattern by implementing functional extensions in ways that Java cannot support.

Java Next:groovy, Scala, or Clojure?