LeetCode 217 Contains Duplicate (Contains Duplicate numbers) (Vector, hash)

Source: Internet
Author: User
Tags integer numbers

LeetCode 217 Contains Duplicate (Contains Duplicate numbers) (Vector, hash)
Translation

Specify an array of integer numbers to check whether the array contains any duplicate content. If any value appears at least twice, true is returned. If each value is different, false is returned ).
Original
Given an array of integers, find if the array contains any duplicates. Your function should return true if any value appears at least twice in the array, and it should return false if every element is distinct.
Analysis

This question is relatively simple and I will not elaborate on it much.

My first response is still original (I try to describe my thinking process in each problem solving process), using std: find () the function searches for repeated values in the vector.

bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   & nums) {    vector
   
    ::iterator temp;    int num_to_find;    for (vector
    
     ::iterator index = nums.begin(); index < nums.end(); ++index) {        num_to_find = *index;        temp = std::find(index + 1, nums.end(), num_to_find);        if (temp != nums.end())            return true;    }    return false;}
    
   
  

Then I put it on LeetCode and tried it. The result is timeout. Well, after all, there are tens of thousands of data records in the test case. Not in a hurry. What if I use the sort function to sort the order first?

bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      & nums) {sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());    vector
      
       ::iterator temp; int num_to_find; for (vector
       
        ::iterator index = nums.begin(); index < nums.end(); ++index) { num_to_find = *index; temp = std::find(index + 1, nums.end(), num_to_find); if (temp != nums.end()) return true; } return false;}
       
      
     
    
   
  

This is useless. Oh, right. Even if the code above is sorted, all the subsequent data is scanned and judged.

However, since the order is arranged, it is not good to use the next value to compare it with the current value?

Current = next? Repeat it! Current <next description? I sorted them out. Isn't that proper? You don't have to judge this. Current> next? It all said that the order has been sorted. Is this possible!

So, look at the code ...... (I changed the index to it, just to make the row look shorter. The meaning of the two variables is the same)

bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         & nums) { if (nums.size() <= 1) return false; sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); vector
         
          ::iterator temp; int num_to_find; for (vector
          
           ::iterator it = nums.begin(), temp = it + 1; it < nums.end(); ++it,++temp) { if (*temp == *it) return true; } return false;}
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  

But here we see two temp:

temp = it + 1;++ temp;

It seems quite troublesome, but it should be clear:

bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            & nums) { if (nums.size() <= 1) return false; sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); vector
            
             ::iterator temp; int num_to_find; for (vector
             
              ::iterator it = nums.begin(); it < nums.end(); ++it) { temp = it + 1; if (*temp == *it) return true; } return false;}
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  
Code
class Solution {public:    bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
               & nums) { if (nums.size() <= 1) return false; sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); vector
               
                ::iterator temp; int num_to_find; for (vector
                
                 ::iterator it = nums.begin(); it < nums.end(); ++it) { temp = it + 1; if (*temp == *it) return true; } return false; }};
                
               
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  
Advanced

My code is 44 ms. Let's take a look at what 36 ms is written by the great god. Come on!

class Solution {public:    bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
               
                
                 
                  & nums) { if(nums.size() == 0) return false; int min = nums[0], max = nums[0]; for(auto n : nums){ if(n > max) max = n; if(n < min) min = n; } int arr[max - min + 1] = {0}; for(auto n : nums){ ++arr[n - min]; } for(int i = 0; i != (max - min + 1); ++i) if(arr[i] > 1) return true; return false; }};
                 
                
               
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  

Interestingly, after sorting by using the sort function, it increases by 4 ms.

class Solution {public:    bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
               
                
                 
                  
                   & nums) { if (nums.size() == 0) return false; sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); int min = nums[0], max = nums[nums.size() - 1]; int arr[max - min + 1] = { 0 }; for (auto n : nums) { ++arr[n - min]; } for (int i = 0; i != (max - min + 1); ++i) if (arr[i] > 1) return true; return false; }};
                  
                 
                
               
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  

Hash

class Solution {public:    bool containsDuplicate(vector
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
               
                
                 
                  
                   
                    & nums) { int count=1000; vector
                    
                      hash[count]; for(int i=0;i
                     
                      =0?nums[i]:-nums[i])%count; for(int j=0;j
                      
                     
                    
                   
                  
                 
                
               
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  

Related Article

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.