Meng Yan C + + learning methods, this is not a way to do things?

"(Meng Yan) I advocate, after having the foundation, learn any new thing, must seize the main line, highlights the point." For the key theory of learning, to focus on, quick. But the side branch stub and the non-essential knowledge content, completely may leave the practice to piecemeal. "The reason for this is that any high-level knowledge content, with only a small part of it, is creative and influential, and many other things are trivial and non-essential." Therefore, the concentration of learning must grasp the really important part of the other things to the practice. For the key knowledge, only focus on learning its theory, to ensure the system, coherence, correctness, and for those side branches, only the side of the study can let you know their true value is small, to let you leave a more vivid impression. If you put your energy in the wrong place, such as using a concentrated chunk of time to learn the small skills that you would have only to check the manual, and for the really important, thoughtful things in the usual piecemeal, then it must be less, or even counterproductive. "So I am dissatisfied with most of the development books on the market-they are basically geared towards the knowledge system itself, not the reader." Always put all the relevant knowledge details in a pile, and then pile it up into a book. Reflected in the content, is the straightforward, without emphasis on the details, often in the third chapter before the use of boring details of the murder of the reader's enthusiasm. Why did Mr. Houtie's "understand MFC" and Scott Meyers's effective C + + be a classic? It is that these two books captured the backbone of their respective fields, sketchy, Gangjumuzhang, and suddenly opened the reader's two-channel governor. Unfortunately, such a book is too few, even the late Richard Stevens and the current Jeffrey Richter book, but also in the system and depth of a man, not a book for readers. ”

Meng Yan C + + learning methods, this is not a way to do things?