Network 1712--c language nested loop Job summary

1. The TA has something to say

• first of all, a weekly blog work is very necessary, the process of programming is not only a few lines of code, can be a good luck through the PTA, you should do is to comb the code ideas, through the other people's Code thinking of the comparison, take its essence, and then continue to step, In order to become a programming language big guy, then the blog Park is a very good platform for everyone to exchange learning. Why not seize the opportunity to improve yourself more comprehensively?

• Second, the blog work in the learning summary is the core of a blog, not a few strokes-"I learned xxxxxx, I will not xxxxxxx"; Human memory is always limited, so-called good memory is not as bad as the written, now can be good memory as well as a good learning summary. Learning Summary Enrichment has material, one is to show you a week to learn the harvest, the second is to improve their ability to learn to summarize, the third is the weekly learning summary has a modular, convenient for the end of the final C language integration of systematic review ( Hope not to appear the following situation!!!) )

• Finally, the amount of homework is indeed very large, the teacher is constantly adjusting to improve, I hope we do not forget beginner's mind, discipline, timely and earnestly completed the assignment of Lin teacher, rich practice is beneficial and harmless; we must keep abreast of the footsteps of Lin, can continue to improve their own!

2. Basic requirements for this assignment scoring rule 2.1

• Pay on time-there are points
• Not delivered-0 points
• More than a week late-flip this job score
• Plagiarism-0 points
• Blog job format is not standardized, no use of markdown grammar-deduction
• Generalities (up to seven points)

2.2 Scoring points

• PTA Job Summary (5 points)
• Peer Code Mutual Evaluation (2 points)
• PTA Ranking (2 points)
  • PTA ranking in 1--10 name: 2 minutes
  • PTA ranking in 11--25 name: 1.5 minutes
  • PTA ranked in 26--58 name: 1 points (PTA completed at least 4 questions, if 4 questions below 0 points)
• Week study Summary (1 points)
• Note the deduction of points
  • Debug Tool Show (-2 points)
  • Learning Summary (-3 points)

3. Job Reviews 3.1 General situation

• Everyone can submit the blog work in time to ensure the basic completion degree, but the quality of blog work still needs to be improved!

3.2 Recommended Blogs ( Click on the name to jump to the job address）

• Shen Mengting Job Score: 9.5 points
• Then job score: 9.0 points
• Li Mengbin Job Score: 10 points
• Zhou Binghui Job Score: 9.5 points
• Chen Zhangxin Job Score: 9.5 points
• Xu Hongwei Job Score: 10 points
• Hong Zhijian Job Score: 9.5 points
• Zhu Jiewei Job Score: 9.5 points

• Steve Leung Lake job score: 9.0 points

• Recommended reasons (Common highlights):
  -More flexible use of debugging tools, making debugging error-checking process more vivid and exciting; Learning summary detailed material, the specific learning summary readability, but also for the future review; The code format specification is neat and has good code comments. We can learn from a wave of learning from each other; the next recommended blog may be yours!

3.3 Example Show

• For the learning summary part, we may think of it as a log, write notes, record this week's learning, review knowledge points and do a self-examination summary, not worry about C language can not improve

• The flexible use of debugging tools is helpful for you to correct your own code errors, proficiency in debugging tools is necessary

• Peer Code Mutual Evaluation is a way to absorb other people's code ideas, differences, and learn from each other good opportunity

• Code comments are more readable and easy for others to interpret and browse

4. Job Performance 4.1 job performance distribution

4.2 Job Performance Details

School Number	name	Job Address	PTA Lab Work 5	Code pairs of peer reviews	PTA Rankings 2	Summary 1	Debugging Tools	Summary	Code Specification	Total	Recommend blog
32	* * Wei	Http://www.cnblogs.com/linyiwei/p/7818828.html	4	1.5	2	0.5	-1			7.5
33	* * Ying	Http://www.cnblogs.com/a2017/p/7816277.html	4	1.5	2	0.5				8
34	* Chuan	Http://www.cnblogs.com/t782170419/p/7819843.html	4.5	1.5	2	0.5				8.5
35	* * Piano	Http://www.cnblogs.com/78tian/p/7800130.html	5	1.5	1	1				8.5
36	* * Ting	Http://www.cnblogs.com/smtwula/p/7813989.html	5	1.5	2	1				9.5	The summary part is informative; The commissioning process is vivid and exciting.
37	* Clean	Http://www.cnblogs.com/tajiyu/p/7788325.html	5	2	1	1				9	A vivid image of the debugging part; the diversity of code Mutual evaluation
38	* * Jade	Http://www.cnblogs.com/q2634615476/p/7795826.html	4.5	1	1	0.5		-0.5		6.5
39	* Huan	Http://www.cnblogs.com/2223ch/p/7801094.html	4.5	1.5	1	1				8
40	* * Ice	Http://www.cnblogs.com/lmb171004/p/7799675.html	5	2	2	1				10	The debugging part is wonderful and vivid;
41	* * Kui	Http://www.cnblogs.com/FOXES/p/7815828.html	4.5	1	1	1			1	7
42	* * Peng	Http://www.cnblogs.com/linyipeng/p/7816795.html	4.5	1	2	0.5	1		1	6.5
43	* River	Http://www.cnblogs.com/LHLH/p/7819907.html	4.5	1	1	1	1		1	6
44	* * Hui	Http://www.cnblogs.com/zbh0831/p/7788716.html	4.5	2	2	1				9.5	The debugging process is detailed and clear, the students can really learn from each other, summing up writing is also very serious in place
45	* * Jay	Http://www.cnblogs.com/yanweijie666/p/7788715.html	4.5	2	2	0.5			0.5	8.5
46	* * Xin	Http://www.cnblogs.com/czx153/p/7801831.html	4.5	2	2	1				9.5	Debug write carefully detailed, peer evaluation objectively listed the advantages and disadvantages between the code, have their own thinking
47	* * German	Http://www.cnblogs.com/gongshunde/p/7814794.html	4.5	2	2	1	0.5		0.5	8.5
48	* * Wei	Http://www.cnblogs.com/doimpossible/p/7777695.html	5	2	2	1				10	With the flow chart to achieve the design ideas, more intuitive, peer-to-peer evaluation of the detailed list of different points, analysis clearly in place
49	* * Rumors	Http://www.cnblogs.com/ljy1999/p/7816679.html	4.5	1.5	2	1				9
50	* * Jian	Http://www.cnblogs.com/xzjj/p/7800443.html	4.5	2	2	1				9.5	Summary in place, code specifications, mutual evaluation of the analysis is also very detailed
51	* * Wei	Http://www.cnblogs.com/wlgczjw/p/7803549.html	5	2	2	1			0.5	9.5	Commissioning specific, mutual evaluation carefully, summed up clear
52	* * Qing	Http://www.cnblogs.com/guobaoqing/p/7797890.html	5	2	2	0.5			0.5	9
53	* * Fang	Http://www.cnblogs.com/mayifang/p/7806738.html	5	1.5	1	1			0.5	8
55	* * Country	Http://www.cnblogs.com/llg202827372/p/7816793.html	5	1	1	0.5		0.5	0.5	6.5
56	* * Lake	Http://www.cnblogs.com/peng075078/p/7816268.html	5	2	2	1		1		9	debugging specific, mutual evaluation carefully, summed up clearly, code comments understandable
57	* Nozomi	Http://www.cnblogs.com/PENGXI/p/7819801.html	5	1	2	0.5	1	0.5	0.5	6.5
58	* * Tao	Http://www.cnblogs.com/yangwent/p/7819001.html	5	1	1	1			0.5	7.5
59	* * Han	Http://www.cnblogs.com/lbhd/p/7818553.html	5	1	1	1	1		0.5	6.5
60	* * Yan	Http://www.cnblogs.com/bigll666/p/7818729.html	5	1	2	1	2		0.5	6.5
61	* * Wei	Http://www.cnblogs.com/Littleweii/p/7811338.html	5	2	2	1	1		1	8
16-22	* Relaxation	Http://www.cnblogs.com/zc-565095526/p/7788827.html	4	1.5	2	0	1	2		4.5
16-46	* * Blossom	Http://www.cnblogs.com/lcq201621123046/p/7821308.html	4	1.5	1	0.5				7

Network 1712--c language nested loop Job summary