Domestic php original Forum. Comparison of the domestic php original Forum ofstarctbwdbdiscuzfastboard ----- my personal summary will not be compared because of the fastboard encryption of travel-of course, it is a good program. the comparison below is a single domestic php original Forum ofstar ctb wdb discuz fastboard comparison ----- personal summary
Because the fastboard of travel is encrypted, it won't be compared-of course it's a good program.
The comparison below is from a technical point of view and does not consider personal expertise. after all, personal expertise varies from person to person!
Comparison: speed, stability, security, load capacity, background, front-end functions
Comparison between ofstar and ctb
1. ofstar is much faster than ctb in terms of speed
2. in terms of stability, ctb still adopts the traditional concept of stability, which is unstable in a sense!
3. in terms of security, ctb does not filter out malicious code and other security problems!
4. in terms of load capacity, when a large amount of data exists, the ctb has a high load caused by management, search, thread, and post browsing! Ofstar adopts a unique read/write algorithm, breaking through the load of text databases for the first time!
5. ctb and ofstar have their own advantages in the background, but the backup of ctb is troublesome.
6. the front-end function ctb is not as good as ofstar!
7. ctb started early, with many ctb plug-ins and many ready-made styles!
Comparison between ofstar and wdb
All existing wdb (original version or hack version) have extremely serious security vulnerabilities, so you can easily get the administrator password! Therefore, we do not make a detailed comparison. The simplicity is as follows: stability, security, load capacity, backend, and template settings are not as good as ofstar, and other people's modified versions are far slower than ofstar versions later.
Comparison between ofstar and discuz
Ofstar uses a flat file database and discuz uses a mysql database.
1. the speed ofstar is much faster than discuz.
2. in terms of stability, due to the use of different databases, such as relatively large scope of coverage, but the text stability algorithm exclusive to ofstar, this is relatively good, and the experiment was successful in large forums!
3. in terms of security, because different databases are used and the comparison is reduced, ofstar in the code is better than discuz free version.
4. because the physical structure of the database is different, the load capacity is compared with the backend management. because ofstar adopts a unique algorithm, the two are comparable!
5. in terms of foreground functions, ofstar provides better anti-theft in images and accessories. the discuz user group functions in the background functions are better than those of ofstar!
6. discuz has developed early and has many plug-ins.
(Source: pocky)
Comparison of javasofstar ctb wdb discuz fastboard ----- my personal summary is not compared because of the fastboard encryption of travel-of course, it is a good program. The comparison below is from...
