Ubuntu is so damn unstable, it's a piece of crap.
CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian three Linux comparison and similarities
http://blog.csdn.net/educast/article/details/38315433/
1.FreeBSD , OpenBSD, Pcbsd, Mac OS (where Mac OS is the most stable) ... The BSD system is the most stable, the Unix kernel is more stable than the stupid Linux kernel!
2.CentOS, Scientific Linux, Red Hat ... (The code for the first two is based on the latter, with enterprise-class performance and stability)
3.Debian, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Slackware--which Debian stable very stable, less resources, APT package used widely, anyway, more stable than Ubuntu, after three because it is source-level compilation, can be very good tailoring customization, Plus the lightweight, non-dependent lxde can also be very stable.
4.OpenSuSe, Fedora, Ubuntu--OpenSuSe is the first to aim at the enterprise level, so stability is not bad, graphic interface hit, Fedora has red hat of good genes, but update frequently unstable, Ubuntu don't mention, stupid x a ...
The following is a selection of the website's stability and performance evaluations of Linux distributions of all kinds:
The Arch + awesome wm is very smooth and stable.
In addition I am i+n dual graphics card, on Bumblebee fix drive problem.
In general, the commercial Linux version is more stable than free; stable stable version phase ratio and instability not tested and verified to be stable
, to be extremely stable, try BSD version of UNIX, more stable than Linux
If the stability of the word is Enterprise Linux, is the so-called El Series of Centos and RHEL
But personally recommended CentOS if you add Rpmforge source, it works.
To be extremely stable, try the BSD version of UNIX, which is more stable than Linux. If you want to expel a noun, it is definitely the Red Hat system, regardless of the professional level, the market choice. Try the science Linux and CentOS, the stability is the same as Red Hat, but the update is slightly slower, science Linux is good, Red Hat updated 48h, he will also have updates. As for Debian, the production environment is still far less than red hat.
Arch, Gentoo
In addition to the arch Linxu, Gentoo, Slackware and a series of Linux and FreeBSD, Unix and other systems
Fedora is a beta version of RHEL .... Stability Rhel > Cent OS > Fedora
Redhat/centos
Debian
The main VPS has CentOS, Debian, and even arch and Gentoo, but it's rare to see SuSE
At present, the most Deb package, RPM system is no way. openSUSE is slowly over fedora, to be honest.
It is said that more than half of the world uses Debian for development
It is said that Rh/gentoo/suse are quite many.
Redhat is said to be the most. But it's a heavily compiled version of CentOS that does use a lot of people.
If you learn to do servers such as: Redhat or CentOS (highly recommended)
Personal feeling Debian stability is greater than ubuntu,ubuntu long-term support version *.0.4 greater than *.10, the more new the more unstable.
But no matter what version, after some tossing stability is very poor, the most stable *nix desktop system feel is Mac OS
Debian or CentOS, I use the former, the stability is very good.
The most stable and best-performing Linux version?