1. more practices and opportunities? 2. entrepreneurial opportunities? 3. how much space does it play? 4. growing together with the company ?...... If you choose a startup company, it is obviously not the salary itself. as long as there is a market price, you can do it. what do you pay more attention? WEBA. weibo. com10015tzbQwXsK92 1. more practices and opportunities?
2. entrepreneurial opportunities?
3. how much space does it play?
4. growing together with the company?
......
If you choose a startup company, it is obviously not the salary itself. as long as there is a market price, you can do it. what do you pay more attention?
Http://weiba.weibo.com/10015/t/zbQwXsK92
Reply: I agree that @ loki said that you must be cautious when you join a startup company, but I think it is too radical. I am afraid you will be admitted to an unreliable startup company twice, is it related to scars?
1. I don't agree that all the members of a startup company should be versatile. Instead, I should observe whether the founders should be versatile and different founders should look for different team configurations; we are looking for more dedicated and professional players to join the entrepreneurial team;
2. is entrepreneurship only related to the boss? If this is the case for a startup company, most of the start points of a large company are to share the interests of its employees. Therefore, before joining the startup team, you can check the future of the company's stock option allocation mechanism to see if the company considers the long-term development of the team's interests.
3. if you are a heavyweight player, it is more advantageous to enter a startup company to take the lead. However, if you are a basic player, you should observe more about whether the startup company has the following talents, if you do not have a leader, proceed with caution.
4. it is true that different entrepreneurial companies are different. our entrepreneurial team basically does not work overtime, and the goal of each step is not delayed.
It is undeniable that the proportion of unreliable teams mentioned above in the market is the majority. Therefore, it is up to the selector to understand the actual situation of the team and have a thorough discussion with the founder, it's always right to be cautious. Answer your four questions separately. here is my opinion.
- What's more, there are more hands and everything is done, and nothing is refined. Opportunities depend on your abilities. no company will give you three months to learn new knowledge without any experience.
- It is the boss's business and has nothing to do with you. unless you are the co-founder, more may be cannon fodder.
- It depends on your position. if you are a dedicated position, you have a lot of space to use. Otherwise, you just need to do some manual work. For example, can you decide the technology selection and service architecture. Or, it's just an ordinary employee.
- Depending on the boss, what I see is that a startup company has a lot of overtime work, a high employee turnover rate, and a batch of new people are involved. As long as the boss can ensure the interests of core personnel, ordinary employees talk about how to grow.
Therefore, you must be cautious when entering a startup company. some companies have a brilliant aura, and the boss has a good reputation. After entering, I found that this was not the case at all. it was a small workshop, sweatshop, and labor-intensive company.
If you want to start your own business, I think the more reliable way is to enter the top companies in the industry, refine the technology, color your resume, wait for opportunities, and meet reliable partners, then start a business. you can also choose to switch to a startup company with potential as the core staff. at this time, you can rely on your own abilities and the working experience and background of major companies in the industry, there is a price code to negotiate with the boss, and the ability to safeguard their own interests. It also has more judgment on the reliability of startups. Interests are the only reliable way for binding people to cooperate.
Benefits include short-term benefits and long-term benefits. If you do not have enough short-term benefits, you will be given long-term benefits. Suitable for two entrepreneurs:
1) Young people are capital and can withstand setbacks. Moreover, the experiences of startups can help new people grow rapidly.
2) the old people who have experience in the relevant industry already have a bottle path in their original positions, and they have their own upward momentum and a certain economic base, I have no confidence in my own business. I'm afraid it's something the company does or someone in the company. What people need to realize their potential is a career they recognize and a group of colleagues who can work together. This is probably only available in startup companies. There are often too many professional mercenaries targeting money in large companies.
There will be some good memories when you enter unreliable start-up companies twice.One by one, the following is your own experience. Not for reference
1. more practices and opportunities? Yes, I am a front-end engineer and I am caught as a front-end development engineer because I am familiar with front-end development. In addition, do not reject SEO support from customers. The company was planning to recruit front-end engineers because I was still a reliable chart cutting level, coupled with a fairly reliable interactive design, decisively dispelled. To this end, I learned a lot of front-end knowledge to block front-end interviewers of second-stream internet companies. Hold the front-end tasks of two or three projects and gain a high weight in the company.
But when you interview positions of other listed companies, people don't care about your skills. You will never be able to answer other questions. for example, in my position, you will always be able to write down your questions in specific ways. You said you would
Friendship
Other guests? I don't care!
2. entrepreneurial opportunities? If you have a promising project and a reliable team, try again. Startup companies do not necessarily have low salaries. Start-ups are more afraid of pig teammates than listed companies. If a Unreliable leader is added, the project will be in waste for a long time.
But if you really encounter unreliable companies, decisive cannon fodder will not be explained.
Some unreliable start-ups are especially infatuated with the talents of large companies. It's hard for you to get stuck for a few years. what do you feel when the chance of appreciation is lost by a person with a flushed resume?
I personally think it is much more difficult to find a very reliable start-up company than to enter a listed company.
3, 4 and above, a large number of companies die each year in the industry, creating a large number of companies. Those that can develop rapidly and make profits. Really is the most desirable choice object. In such a large base, making the right choice depends on your judgment and fate.
The above is my resume. I am a PHP development engineer. Right when everyone smiles, my point is that you may wish to go to a reliable startup company. Why are listed companies not cannon fodder?
It's mainly about people. looking at people, what they are pursuing, whether it's a short-term stability or a seemingly bright future. If I work as a core developer in a startup company, and the technology is difficult, the technology is improved, but the salary is low, is it reliable?
