What is media doing in the face of today's uncertain news?

An American University has encountered a campus shooting incident. Up to now, 33 people have been killed and more than 20 people have been injured. This is of course a miserable thing, and I hope it will never happen in the future.
But let's see what our media is doing.
The US police did not determine the nationality of the man, and the large media did not confirm the news. They only mentioned that the man was an Asian man. There are at least three possibilities:

1. They are not Asian men at all. What witnesses see is not true;
2. It is indeed an Asian man, but not a Chinese man.
3. Chinese.

Our lovely media simply ignores these possibilities, I quoted an unknown "×××× times" report (even this newspaper only vaguely said that it may be the third case ), it is almost a vow to tell you the third possibility. Isn't that just an example?
If it is a good thing, we can still say that we did what we did without confirmation. After all, we are our fellow citizens. What is the reason that such a thing cannot be regarded as a good thing in any way? Do you have to worry about anything to attract your attention?
In addition, there are some more interesting things. On many forums, many people have apologized to American friends for the incident. I said, dude, are you so anxious?

In addition, if, according to some people, the person is 24 years old, then the person is in 1980s. Most Chinese students do not have the power to kill their hands. Let alone kill people. I'm afraid none of the chickens have ever been killed. What is known now is that the man has a gun with both hands, his mind is rigorous, and his mental quality is superb.
There are so many strange things.

==========================================
It has been confirmed that this is not what we don't want to see. Some people have been slapped !!!