Why Linux founder is not optimistic about C ++

Why is Linux founder not optimistic about C ++-general Linux technology-Linux programming and kernel information? The following is a detailed description. The reason is that C ++ has three main characteristics of object-oriented, which are also the most important of object-oriented: encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism.

In dialectical materialism, the strongest place in C ++ is also the weakest place in C ++.

1: The Key is encapsulated. How does the program control all variables and functions? The flexibility of C is completely lost!

2: C ++ prohibits full access to the physical memory, but C is not limited, so it is difficult for you to use C ++ to write the operating system?

3: You can inherit the classes written by others. I don't think they are so brilliant. You still "know it, but you don't know it !" If you do not look at the class definition, you do not know the design ideas of experts. How much can you improve?

I reiterate that C ++ is a very good language. It has its own strengths and weaknesses with C. It is recommended that you learn it and abandon C completely in the C ++ program.

I reiterate that the position of the Linux founder does not represent my position. I think C and C ++ should not be less, and Java is also good, but Java should not be compared with its Uncle C.