Oracle ide has always been the main jdeveloper
But with the acquisition of sun, netbeans
It should be the official ide that Oracle has been pushing for a long time, because from the perspective of policy, netbeans should be a better choice:
- Size: netbeans
6.7.1 (with Java EE Support and two glassfish versions) 158 in total
MB, while jdeveloper is about 1 GB. The size of the software installation package is an important factor.
- Popular: netbeans is very popular. In this survey
A total of 2,753 voters, of which netbeans received 1,191, eclipse received 1,340 votes, and jdeveloper only had 39 votes in the zone. (The plain text editor received 103 votes :-)). Search by Google
The popularity of netbeans exceeds that of jdeveloper.
- Java
FX: netbeans supports Java FX.
- Visual Design: netbeans has advanced swing/
Visual design capabilities of UI, databinding, and database. Based on JSR-296 and
295, which can be extended better, such as better beans binding
.
- Report: ireport
Report tool, a jasperreport Based on netbeans
Tool.
- MySQL/Oracle Support: netbeans provides very convenient support for Oracle/MySQL. Not as good as SQL developer in Oracle
But this support is easily extended, and SQL developer can be replaced in the future.
- Dtrace support: netbeans already has dtrace support
It depends on whether Oracle continues to support Solaris.
- Glassfish/BEA support: netbeans integrates Bea and glassfish well.
Both jdeveloper and netbeans are based on Swing, while jdeveloper was initially based on JBuilder and prime time (a plug-in system ). However, there is no obstacle to porting the jdeveloper feature to netbeans.
Original article: Why Oracle shocould continue to push netbeans