Recent reports on Google Glass seem to be free from negative news. First, there are many restrictions on entry into the UK, which are hardly mentioned in this year's Google I/O, flash has been officially launched for Google's Android Wear wearable platform, as well as three brand new smart watches, especially the Moto 360.
Ron Amadeo, creator of Arstechnica, experiences a brand new Android Wear smart watch and thinks Google Glass will be abandoned, because basically all watches can be made by Glass, and watches do not have the disadvantages of Glass. Amadeo, a user of Glass Explorer, found that his Glass was stuck in the drawer after the first freshness.
Quick access to information
Like Google Glass, Android Wear has popular keyword bar detection and voice control functions, and basically does not require manual control. Android Wear is even better in some aspects. For example, Glass needs to be raised or touched to start voice control, while Wear is always on, which can be used for voice input at any time. Both devices are connected to Google's knowledge graph, which can answer some basic questions and send messages to friends using voice.
Rapid handling notification
Here Wear solves a problem that many Glass users complain about. To be compatible with an independent app, Glass needs to be re-developed, and Android Wear can be automatically compatible with all apps, including third-party apps that are not optimized for Android Wear. This is because the notification that Wear receives is the notification that the mobile phone receives. You can ignore or process the notification.
The only thing Google Glass is better than Android Wear is cameras, but this has become a major problem.
Smart watches are more accepted by the society
Android Wear is a smart watch, which is more accepted by social media. Because unlike Google Glass, you don't need to wear a 24/7 camera to someone else. When you talk to others, they can look at you, not the Glass on your face. You can wear a smart watch all day, and no one will think it strange. When you wear Glass outside, everyone will think that you are the "person with Google Glass ".
In addition, there is the Glass camera of low quality, and its 5 million pixel lens is as bad as the Android camera in the Galaxy Nexus era. Cameras are also one of the reasons for many privacy concerns. The first person's perspective live broadcasting may be its only advantage.
Smart watches are more convenient to wear
As mentioned above, Google Glass is unacceptable in many places, and you need to remove it and put it up. The problem is that, as smart glasses, Glass cannot fold like normal glasses. This means that it needs to occupy an area of the header size for storage, which is inconvenient. Currently, it does not have a good storage method. There are also some bad options, either hanging around your neck or moving it over your head like sunglasses.
Smart watches are much easier. You can wear them in any public place, so you don't have to worry about storage even if you need to remove them. You may even forget your own watch. Glass will always be in front of you, and others will always see it.
Smart watches are more ergonomic
Anyone who has used Google Glass knows that its screen is positioned above the usual sight. Because it is worn on your head, you can't adjust your line of sight through the movements of your neck. You can only achieve this by rotating your eyes. The result is that wearing Glass eyes will be uncomfortable for a long time, and many people feel a headache. Smart watches look much more natural.
Android Wear is cheaper
Google Glass costs $1500, while lg g Watch and Gear Live only costs $200.
Wear will have a better ecosystem
Google Glass is only a small project under Google X in the Google empire. Its support for Glass mainly falls on Google X, while other teams are not very interested in it. For example, Glass took 8 months to support Google's IM service. In contrast, Android Wear is a project of the Android team, and this team is one of the most important teams of Google. There are not many mainstream apps that support Google Glass, and Android Wear already has a series of app support when it is launched. Speaking of this, we also need to point out that Glass is still in beta, and Wear has been listed as a hardware product of mainstream manufacturers.
In addition, because Android Wear products are far cheaper than Glass products, it is much easier to reach a certain user base.
Is Glass dead?
From the current perspective, Google Glass mainly hopes to be in the professional field. The first-person perspective of live broadcasting and augmented reality are available for further development. However, Google Glass, as a consumer, is basically dead. The Glass project started a year earlier than Wear, but it is still only a project under Google X. Wear, a child of Android, is obviously more valued than Wear.
Therefore, unless Google begins to pay more attention to Glass, the speed will be very slow even if there is a breakthrough in Glass. Now that Google has Android Wear in the wearable field, Google Glass is less likely to attack the system.
From: http://www.leiphone.com/google-glass-obsolete.html