When Ubuntu users get used to their desktops, they occasionally try other newer ones, such as Fedora. Both Ubuntu users and Fedora users should understand the differences between Fedora and Ubuntu, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in the field of research. No, MattHartley posted his opinion on datamation. Fedoravs. Ubuntu: simple installation. Both Ubuntu and Fedora are excellent.
When Ubuntu users get used to their desktops, they occasionally try other newer ones, such as Fedora. Both Ubuntu users and Fedora users should understand the differences between Fedora and Ubuntu, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in the field of research. No, Matt Hartley posted his opinion on datamation.
Fedora vs. Ubuntu: easy to install
Ubuntu and Fedora are both excellent in that the installation is extremely simple. Select a partition and click "Next ".
However, when you choose to download the ISO file, the situation is different. Fedora provides GNOME Desktop while Ubuntu is Unity. Both are shared, but the most important part is that they have different user experiences. Personally, I think Unity and vanilla GNOME are at the same level, and they have many identical functions.
Another interesting commonality between Ubuntu and Fedora is that they both support customization. For example, Fedora supports KDE and Ubuntu also supports KDE. However, the difference is that Fedora also supports other desktop environments, such as KDE. Ubuntu does not.
Fedora vs. Ubuntu: software availability
Ubuntu has rich availability software, partly because software developers support Debian packages. And even expanded to the Ubuntu personal package file (PPA ). The tragedy is that Fedora cannot really compare this aspect. Although Fedora can use the RPM search engine to locate RPM software packages, in most cases, the available software packages of Fedora are not comparable to Ubuntu.
Now, I should declare that the Fedora user does have available resources. For example, the well-known Koji allows Fedora application developers to host software packages and share them with others. But perhaps the closest example to the PPA ora user PPA is Fedora People Repositories. It is helpful to access the user's storage room, but I want to ask someone, can you show me how Fedora has a higher software availability than Ubuntu, because I didn't see this at all.
Fedora vs. Ubuntu: software management
In Ubuntu, dpkg is used for software management. End Users install and remove software from the Ubuntu Software Center. The software center can help users find new software and even include new games recommended on the homepage. In addition, users still rely on terminals such as APT.
Fedora also allows you to install software only using yum from the terminal. However, what Fedora provides closest to the Software Center is called PackageKit. The concept of PackageKit is similar to that of the Ubuntu Software Center: you can install the software through the GUI here. The differences between the two are as follows: First, PackageKit is not as well-known as the software center. Second, PackageKit does not have the software rolling function.
For more information about Fedora, see Fedora topics page http://www.linuxidc.com/topicnews.aspx? Tid = 5
For more information about Ubuntu, see Ubuntu special page http://www.linuxidc.com/topicnews.aspx? Tid = 2