Complaints, about university computer teachers

First of all, I want to comment on college computer education based on my technical skills.

I have been thinking about a problem over the past few days. We have a senior who has deep professional accomplishments such as Qiu zongyan and Pan aimin. Why is there no available c \ c ++ compiler; on the blog page, many graphics experts write light trackers by themselves. In contrast, the entire CG industry did not produce software similar to Pixar renderman, and did not create a studio like ILM. On the Internet, we also have countless highly handwritten forums and websites, which are quite professional and mature. Why are we not using software like Apache, PHP, and tomcat?

This is a miserable scene. On the contrary, I thought of history. In the Napoleon era, the French army swept across Europe, but even the military uniforms of their soldiers were all made in England. The final failure was largely due to the economy. However, the irony is that the value of the Napoleon code plays an important role, so that today's scholars continue to advocate for the Study of Law, it has provided good conditions for France's implementation of private ownership and capitalism, but it has not yet brought about a lasting and vital impetus for development.

It is said that the University has spent a lot of money on equipment and 19-core LCD computers, but the quality of teaching staff is as bad as ever. From the perspective of Xie Ding, a teacher in our C language, said that in contrast to tan haoqiang's book, referring to the comparison example, in addition to basic is Fortran, it makes people feel that he jumped from 1980s. On the Concept of C language, the key part is also confused. The differences between pointers and arrays are unclear. Therefore, I strongly recommend that you read the C expert programming carefully. I don't understand the value of the examples in Tan haoqiang's book,CodeThe format is not standard. If a standard C entry function is connected, the differences between the compiler linker are not mentioned. The sample code is filled with countless buffer vulnerabilities, I can't imagine how the person who just learned this book could program, but how to use this book to teach students how to afford their own tuition fees.

AndProgramThere are too many related things. Aren't boys fond of playing games or warcraft? I just ran from an orc infantry engineer to a map, then we found that the entire process of the enemy joining the melee and finally the heroic death began to describe the entire process in C language, which also involved the basic idea of the program, various design ideas, as small as the life of the structure, operations on struct and many other language-level elements. Aren't girls fond of downloading Korean dramas? I will start with the video file standard.Algorithm, How to use C to convert and compress videos, and so on, to let them know how a series of operations hidden behind the mouse are implemented in C language, and even how the operating system works, process threads can all be discussed.

I can say that the C language is unqualified. After all, when I understand the syntax or something, the growth of skill is especially dependent on my learning and exploration process. The elective course "database basics" is actually about Visual FoxPro. I don't understand how the school arranges such courses. VFP itself is a product that has been abandoned by Microsoft. These colleges and universities just want to allow students to get a second-level 30 yuan certificate of the Chinese font, it allows students to spend a lot of time on the garbage that cannot be learned at all. The instructor of SQL Server is even more involved. They all talk about things in the live demonstration. They are also known as doctors. In addition, I am not proficient in this major at all. I don't even know about the basic touch class. Except for the tool itself, I don't know how to teach the most valuable design, but I am entangled in unnecessary commands.

As a result, we also know that most of the University's undergraduate computer students are talented people, and they have long been so miserable that they are not themselves. They have all been killed from the high school army, and their learning abilities have long been recognized by their peers. Why have they become people who only eat, drink, play, and pack their girls at night? First, these teachers have a big problem. There are still many talented teachers, but their attitudes towards students are not technical standards, but moral character.

I am complaining and hope to communicate with teachers who work as university teachers.