Performance
Sossaman with the Xeon architecture will bring a more power-saving solution to the server. But what is the difference between performance and Xeon? And how much electricity will be saved? Recently, the Japanese side has answered this question for us.
The test's Sossaman model uses the E7520 chipset, inside the X6DLP-4G2 Blade server, two CPU Take-off frequency on 2GHz, the other configuration is: 1 FDD floppy disk drive, a SCSI hard drive, the following is a close-up of this model:
The figure above is the CPU's power consumption at 40%~50%, and the following figure is the power value of the system when it is idle.
1U server layout is quite refreshing
Four logical CPUs are mixed together.
Compare Test Model Details |
Sossaman model |
Xeon Model |
Cpu |
2.0GHz FSB 667mhzx2 |
3.0GHz FSB 800mhzx2 |
Memory |
Ddrii 512M ECC X 2 |
Ddrii 512M ECC X 2 |
Hard disk |
SCSI X 1 |
SATA 250GB X 2 |
Server model |
x6dlp-4g2+sc811lf-260 |
6014v-t2 |
These are some of the information on the comparison model.
|
Sossaman 2.0GHz
(General situation) |
Sossaman 2.0GHz
SpeedStep
(Automatic mode) |
Sossaman 2.0GHz
SpeedStep
(Power saving mode) |
Xeon 3.0GHz |
Power is switched on instantaneously |
109w |
107w |
107w |
230W |
When entering BIOS |
86w |
86w |
68w |
195w |
When the system starts |
115w |
116w |
78w |
239w |
When idle |
75w |
74w |
55T |
156w |
CPU when used in 25% |
98w |
96w |
72w |
203w |
CPU when used in 50% |
111w |
103w |
77w |
237w |
CPU when used in 100% |
117w |
116w |
81w |
253w |
The time used for Super pi 1.04 million |
42 seconds. |
44 seconds. |
--- |
44 seconds. |
The above is the Power comparison table, you can see, just launched the Sossaman, even if the operating frequency is only 2.0GHz, even if the supported chipset is relatively immature, but in performance has been comparable to 3GHz Xeon.
(