[MAP gun] Personal Experience: Linux vs Mac OS X vs windows

Linux vs Mac OS X vs windows

I think this topic is a bit DT.

But write it down. Isn't it a map gun?

For Linux, I use Ubuntu as an example...

1 Software

The software windows will not be mentioned ..

Mac OS X has many Windows software alternatives

For example, Photoshop...

Taking tx qq as an example, Mac QQ is far better than Linux QQ. Just cannot use camera voice chat

Linux package management is good, it is very convenient to find software to install...

2 compatibility

This problem is basically the biggest headache for Linux.

I admit that Ubuntu has good compatibility. I can install it on my computer. What if other people do?

Mac OS must be well integrated with hardware, such as multi-touch

Windows Hardware is compatible, and mainstream software and hardware are designed for it.

3 games

I use two identical core2 3.0gh + ATI hd4650 + 4 GB memory machines and one iMac 27-inch iMac Machine

Run Call of Duty 4

Windows is far slower than Mac OS!

Windows resolution 1280*1024 special effects are completely off and FPS is obviously dropped,

The MACOs resolution is 2560*1440 and the special effects are fully enabled. It feels smooth and the game loading speed is far higher than that of windows.

Linux can only run in wine

Not as efficient as windows.

(Wine can use StarCraft II and cod6, which is great)

Technical Support

Windows has many problems, but there are also many solutions.

IMac is most praising that our dealers here can train your snow leopard System for free. I think this is worth learning from other systems,

What if I give you 1999 oceans for Windows? Who will train me? It's just for an update. It's not enough. Linux and Mac are mostly free of charge.

Price:

If you want to use Mac OS, you have to purchase Apple's machines (IMAC/MacBook Pro). The prices of these machines are not very good. For example, a black Apple may only have 6000.

Windows: If you buy a new computer, there will be several hundred. I remember that XP's Home Edition is only 499 licensed.

Linux: You can choose free, but never tell me that RedHat is free. My friend bought it. It costs $2499 to buy it in the United States for three years!

Summary:

I think existence is his meaning. In addition to scientific research and technical applications, we also need daily simple applications and management. For example, photo management, such as audio and video files, such as games.

So I don't think it should be the same as that of the XX missionary. I have to hope that everyone will use any bird system.

For example

A company has money and buys a batch of Windows licenses. How about 100,000?

Enterprises rely on costs. It is also worthwhile to make windows fully-qualified, because it is much more cost-effective than training employees to use Linux and change the Linux software.

For example, if we invite orxxxx experts, the salaries are 12000 oceans/day.

(It is also said that the Yunnan side is too low... I guess the miguo may be 1 million USD/day, but our teacher said that if the consulting experts are more expensive, they may be 1 million USD an hour, and the hundreds of thousands of licenses may be just a few days of salary)

For example, if it takes 7 days to train Linux, the cost of one employee is 1 million USD per day. If a company has at least 1 million employees, the training cost is as high as 1 million USD per day ======

I have read a book saying that it takes about 1.9 billion US dollars to build a Ubuntu, so we can build another ubuntu.

Of course, it is good to choose any system.

AsProgramPersonnel, we should see other excellent systems, not just a sp.

In addition, I found that it is common in China to force others to learn things..