Modern University Computer sorrow-University VS Training Unit

Today, with the development of computer technology, computer application technology is a hard indicator to measure the informatization technology of a country. Why can foreign computer talents reach such a high level in terms of technology? Are we really inferior to others? Is there a problem with our education system? Or why does it restrict our technical learning? Is everything worth thinking about? Now I will talk about my views from the perspective of a training institution.

In China, the computer development is very fast, but this is just relative to the domestic, it can be said that it is self-styled, modern college students, especially computer students, in addition to individual or national key universities, there is a huge pressure on employment. Why? After four years of university study, I was not comparable to a secondary school in a technical school. I also had a student who graduated from college, I chose a training school or a technical school to enable myself to have a technology that can make a living and establish myself in the society. So now, is our university a day? No one can answer, but in fact, many of my friends often complain that they have not yet trained students that are not as competitive as some technical students. In fact, they have gone through investigation, computer majors do not have more than 20% of college students engaged in computer-related work, but the market demand is far greater than supply. What should we do to improve the quality and skills of students?

I think the school should be a training base for all talents, and the training institution is a place to train professional and technical talents. The training institutions have played such a role well, but the number of college students received accounts for more than 90% of the total market. Why did college students go to training institutions? What did they do in college? What does the university teach them? This issue requires us to think about it together. Before that, I have been to many universities and trained students. During the chat, I had a better understanding of this special university training institution. Here, I will summarize it as follows:

Comparison between weak University links and training institutions

1. according to the survey, the University's computer courses are fully arranged. after going to the university, if the students can fully master all the knowledge, then the students must be all talented, because almost all aspects of the computer are involved. Although this idea is good, it ignores many practical problems. Although every aspect is involved, it is only involved. Every aspect of technology is limited to, but not refined. In addition, according to the forgotten curve of the human brain, when I got to my senior year, I forgot everything I had in the past few years. I checked the university course schedule. For example, I opened C in my freshman year and next semester, in the next few years, I will not even be reached after graduation. In this case, they are all learning about monkeys, and only the last one is left, and the rest is immature. Therefore, if you want to train students who are really technical and competent, you must change the course. This does not mean that you have to discard certain subjects. On the contrary, you can increase the number of students to expand their thinking. However, you must include all the projects between university and university. In this way, after four years of university completion, they will skillfully apply all kinds of learned knowledge to achieve the goal of cultivating full talents. The Course Arrangement of training institutions is generally based on urgent training (practical training) for practical development. Each course will be interlocking, and all subjects will be flexibly applied in actual practice, after the training, you can enter the enterprise and use what you have learned.

2. I don't know how you select or use the standards used by computer teachers in colleges and universities. However, as far as I know, the technology between teachers is uneven, the main reason is that teachers' attitudes, attitudes, and qualities have been declining. I don't know why, so I can't investigate it. I only see the results. As for the process, it cannot be imagined (Of course, not all of them are like this, except for some, which is universal) that training institutions have top technical talents, most of them are technical geeks who have years of practical development experience at work or gold medal lecturers in this industry.

3. in contact with the students, many students (more than 90%) said that the instructors did not have a sense of responsibility, and they did not understand or understand their own processes after finishing the course, in addition, many students think that the teaching teacher has poor skills and often asks questions, which cannot be solved by the Teacher. This will lead to the students to slack their minds and eventually lose their confidence. All the project managers and instructors in the training institution will provide full answers and assistance, because of their commitment to students and their reputation for the training center, no one dares to leave the students alone.

4. project experience after graduation, college students will face severe employment challenges. What advantages do they have? Work experience? No. Tough technology? No. Project experience? No. Who makes the mistake of having no college student or competing with others? Of course, he is a teaching teacher, because he does not have any work experience. I only took textbooks as my textbook (why did I teach in this age?). I once asked my classmates a question in class and learned for a year.ProgramDesign, what will happen now, a student replied: "Only do questions", isn't it sad. Who can blame modern college students for being taught like this? Learning computer is mainly to enable students to solve problems with divergent thinking and innovative ideas, rather than just being a nerd. How can an enterprise use such a college student? Training Institutions all have a large number of technicians from different companies. They have strong technical skills and rich working experience. These things are exactly what students need when they enter the Enterprise. Here, they teach students how to do it, how to think about it, and how to plan it. These will be all of their valuable experience, which is very important for students to get into work.

5. many teachers teach courses in the traditional way. As we all know, everything in books is dead. For a group of college students who develop their thinking, this is simply getting them stuck. This limits students' thinking. Then we will gradually lose confidence. The result is: don't learn. the lecturers in training institutions not only have work experience in the company, but also have strong teaching ability. They will develop the maximum potential of students.

conclusion: In general, training institutions are usually eager to learn, that is, the learning time is short, this has led to the fact that in a short period of training, you can only be proficient in one aspect of knowledge. For this reason, you will basically learn around the clock and bring students to an emergency gathering, it is better to stimulate students' desire to learn. In summary, it is clear why many students enter different training institutions in order to find a good job when they graduate or are about to graduate, so that you can have a weight to compete with others in the workplace, and all the knowledge learned is the most needed by the enterprise. The University is a place for training talents. As long as the rules are good, more talents will be trained. I hope I can learn from the training institutions to improve and improve the teaching solution, it will cultivate more talents for society. (For more information, see the source)