Oracle Database attitudes towards enterprises dependent on them

Welcome to the world of Oracle databases. For Oracle databases, Oracle will certainly use its strength to support some enterprises that rely on it to survive some important data. Oracle has a high-quality sales team and excellent personnel training mechanism.

Oracle's ability to control MySQL copyrights and its ability to grant commercial licenses to users will also keep many users on its track, if you pay thousands of dollars to buy a commercial license, it is cheaper to hire a lawyer to determine if you comply with the GPL license. Although a large number of MySQL users mainly run blogs and other basic websites and store their own content in this database, these versions of MySQL software hardly generate any revenue.

Will Oracle require them to pay? Alternatively, Oracle may regard them as a team to be nurtured and encourage them to enjoy Open-Source Licenses until they grow into larger and more commercialized enterprises.

Some enterprises may have no choice but to treat Oracle database sales personnel politely. Many software companies build their own software packages around MySQL and sell the two software as an integrated tool. If they want to bind MySQL with their own code, or if they think it is necessary to do so, they need to continue purchasing a commercial license.

MySQL and NoSQL

Oracle databases must be smart enough to recognize that they have limited requirements before users start to rewrite their own code. For example, Twitter has announced that it will migrate its infrastructure to Cassandra, another open source software program that is more open than Apache licenses.

Twitter's moves may be driven by technical reasons: Cassandra is a very simple and fast database, saving a lot of more advanced protection, such as transaction processing. There are also many projects like Cassandra. All these projects are usually defined by the popular term "NoSQL.

Widenius said Twitter's practice may also provide a way for users who do not want to get involved in a license dispute. However, using NoSQL is costly: NoSQL clearly has its own position. However, common NoSQL developers provide you with more performance in one aspect, while they sacrifice flexibility and interoperability in many aspects. This is not acceptable.

They will remind you of many databases that existed before MySQL was created. When MySQL became popular, it eliminated many databases like MySQL, because SQL interfaces are easier to use and connect to other applications.

At the same time, the current NoSQL database reminds people of what MySQL was like. This database is also an edge product like Cassandra at the beginning. It provides very fast storage capability by giving up protection measures for most traditional databases. Over the past many years, MySQL has added many features and established tools that can handle more advanced tasks. All these jobs require more engineers and more budget.

Widenius and enterprises and organizations that rely heavily on MySQL feel insecure. If MariaDB fails because a potential customer requires a clear explanation of the license issue, there will be only one company that fails. In this way, he can say that the adverse impact of Oracle Database and Sun merger he predicted in his defense statement is correct. If MariaDB is prosperous, it will succeed. However, his predictions will certainly be more skeptical.

On this road, he will be the David who killed the giant Gloria Oracle. On the other hand, he will be seen as Cassandra, a prophet with baby in his arms ). The baby grew up and found a good life, with beautiful friends and their own yacht. In both cases, it is both correct and wrong.