Arm value Geometry Calxeda Server Evaluation report: Next

Yesterday's "Arm value Geometry Calxeda Server evaluation report: Medium" Evaluation is based on theoretical data, processor performance and application environment, next we look at the real-world performance, and the overall evaluation data for a summary.

Real Environment test

We built two sets of systems with two different Xeon CPUs, 128GB memory and ESXi 5.1. We created 24 virtual machines on the Xeon server, and in each virtual machine we set up a phpBB with four virtual CPUs and 4GB Ram (http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/14417.html " >apache2, MySQL) site, each site uses about 8GB of hard disk space. We simulated up to 75 concurrent users who made new requests every 0.6–2.4 seconds.

The Boston viridis server is subject to the same workload, but instead of using virtual machines, we use 24 physical server nodes.

Since being redesigned in the late 2010, our Vapus stresstesting framework is ideal for clicking (whether virtualized) clusters with a large number of parallel workloads. A four-core 7400 server can produce 24 test users connected to our Dell PowerConnect 8024F (10Gbit Ethernet), which is connected to the tested server.

Vapus hitting Web servers in parallel

Vapus can also click on 24 Web servers

With this approach, we were able to simulate a web hosting environment in which dozens of sites were clicked by thousands of visitors per second. This may not sound impressive, but these thousands of requests per second bring 100 million clicks a day to a site environment.

Because we ensure that our Web server can provide some high-quality images (PNG), the resulting network traffic is huge. The peak we tested reached 8gbit/s, while typical network traffic was about 4–6gbit/s.

123456 next Read full-text paging navigation 1. Real environment Test 2. The results are very important 3. Response Time 4. Energy and power consumption 5. The Roadmap and our views of the Wang (author: the editor: Wang)