Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall
"In the end, we believe that the court's demands are not in harmony with our privacy policy, traditional court rulings and international law," TorrentSpy team said. So we now decide to take the final approach to protecting user privacy-permanently shutting down the site. ”
Beijing Time March 30 news, according to foreign media reports, a costly battle has led to BitTorrent file sharing service search engine TorrentSpy shut down.
A statement on the home page of the TorrentSpy website said that the search engine TorrentSpy closed not because of any court decisions or agreements, but because of their team's decision. The statement, released by the TorrentSpy team, says that in the past two years, TorrentSpy has invested hundreds of thousands of of dollars in "safeguarding users and their own interests" in a legal environment that is bad for file sharing.
"In the end, we believe that the court's demands are not in harmony with our privacy policy, traditional court rulings and international law," TorrentSpy team said. So we now decide to take the final approach to protecting user privacy-permanently shutting down the site. ”
TorrentSpy is a search engine that helps visitors find torrent format shared files on the Internet. Torrent shared files tend to be music or movies that are easy to share. TorrentSpy search engine has been opposed by the entertainment industry, the entertainment industry does not want its own copyright content to share free.
Last December, the American Film Association (Motion Picture Association of AMERICA,MPAA) won a lawsuit against the TorrentSpy infringement case. The case was brought to court by the Association in 2006. However, TorrentSpy argues that its Web site does not contain any copyright works or links to copyrighted work, does not promote copyright infringement, and that they are not responsible for the behavior of visitors leaving their site. The website lost the lawsuit because the court found the site had damaged evidence.