cingular 3125

encountered such a problem in the development of a software process:If a FD is known, how can I get the full path of the file corresponding to this FD? Whether it's Linux, FreeBSD, or any other Unix system that doesn't provide such an API, what do you do? Let's think in a different way: Is there any software under Unix that can get the files that the process is opening? If you have enough experience, it is easy to think of lsof, which can be used to know which files the process is opening, and

the full path of the corresponding file. What if Linux, FreeBSD, or other UNIX systems do not provide such an API? Let's think about it another way: What software is available under UNIX to get what files the process has opened. If you're experienced enough, it's easy to think of lsof, using it to know which files the process has opened, and what process a file is open to. OK, let's try a little program to test lsof and see how it gets the files that the process has opened. * TESTLSOF.C *

I do? Let's look at it from another perspective: Is there any software in UNIX that can get the files opened by the process? If you have rich experience, it is easy to think of lsof. You can use it to know which files are opened by a process or which process is opened by a file. Okay, let's use a small program to test lsof and see how it gets the files opened by the process. /* Testlsof. C */# include Put testlsof into the background for running, and the PID is

encountered such a problem in the development of a software process: a known FD, how to obtain the full path of the corresponding file of FD? Whether it's Linux, FreeBSD, or any other Unix system that doesn't provide such an API, what do you do? Let's think in a different way: Is there any software under Unix that can get the files that the process is opening? If you have enough experience, it is easy to think of lsof, which can be used to know which files the process is opening, and which proc

within a process has a unique file descriptor (Fd:file descriptor) that corresponds to this file. And I encountered such a problem in the development of a software process:If a FD is known, how can I get the full path of the file corresponding to this FD? Whether it's Linux, FreeBSD, or any other Unix system that doesn't provide such an API, what do you do? Let's think in a different way: Is there any software under Unix that can get the files that the process is opening? If you have enough exp

action * *return 0;} 　　 The testlsof is placed in the background and its PID is 3125. Command Lsof-p 3125 to see which files are open for process 3125, we use Strace to track lsof runs, and the output is saved in Lsof.strace:　　 # gcc Testlsof.c-o testlsof#./testlsof [1] 3125# strace-o Lsof.strace lsof-p

) that corresponds to this file when you open a document within the process. And I was in the development of a software process encountered such a problem: Given an FD, how do I get the full path to the file corresponding to this FD? Whether Linux, FreeBSD, or other UNIX systems do not provide such an API, what do we do? Let's think about it another way: is there any software under Unix that can get the files that the process opened? If you're experienced enough, it's easy to think of lsof, usi

path of the file corresponding to this FD? No such API is provided in Linux, FreeBSD, or other UNIX systems. What should I do? Let's think from another angle: Is there any software in UNIX that can obtain the files opened by the process? If you have rich experience, it is easy to think of lsof. You can use it to know which files are opened by the process or a documentWhich process is opened. Okay, let's use a small program to test lsof and see how it gets the files opened by the process.

Configure the IP address of the Xerox Phaser 3125n printer Connect the Xerox Phaser 3125n printer to the network and turn on the power. Press and hold the cancel key on the printer until the printer prints the configuration page. Write down the MAC address. Then, use the set IP tool on a Windows host to configure the IP address based on the MAC address. Note that Xerox Phaser 3125n printing has no LCD screen and only one cancel button, so there is no way to configure IP address on the printer

Configure the IP address of the Xerox Phaser 3125N printerConnect the network cable to the Xerox Phaser 3125N printer and turn the power on. Press and hold the Cancel key on the printer until the printer prints out the Configuration page. Make a note of the MAC Address. Then use the Set IP tool on the Windows host to configure the IP address based on the MAC address.Note that Xerox Phaser 3125N printing does not have an LCD screen, there is only one Cancel button, so there is no way to configure

1051 Fax Number: +1 847 523 2854 Initial Expert Group Membership: Initial EG Membership: * Aplix * Cingular * Ericsson Mobile platforms (EMP) * Esmertec * IBM * Intel * Nokia * Orange France * Philips * RIM * Si Emens * Sony-ericsson Mobile * Sun Microsystems, Inc. * T-mobile * Vodafone Supporting this JSR: * Aplix * Cingular * Ericsson Mobile platforms (EMP) * Esmertec * IBM * Intel * Orange France

Configure the IP address of the Xerox Phaser 3125N printer to connect the Xerox Phaser 3125N printer to the network line and turn on the power. Press and hold the Cancel key on the printer until the printer prints the Configuration page. Write down the MAC Address. Then, use the Set IP tool on a Windows host to configure the IP Address based on the MAC Address. Note that Xerox Phaser 3125N printing has no LCD screen and only one Cancel button, so there is no way to configure IP Address on the pr

The original question is this: 5 monkeys picked 1 piles of peaches together, because they were too tired, they agreed to decide, first sleep and then points. After a long time, came the first monkey, it saw other monkeys did not come, will this pile of monkeys into five parts, the result of more than 1, will be more this eat, by the way take away the 1 piles. After a long time, the 2nd monkey came, it does not know that there are 1 companions have come, mistakenly think they are the 1th to, so t