beginning, the deletion process does not update the iterator state, so the final state is inconsistent. First, take a look at iterator's delete code: Public BooleanRemove (Object o) {if(O = =NULL) { for(intindex = 0; index ) if(Elementdata[index] = =NULL) {fastremove (index); return true; } } Else { for(intindex = 0; index ) if(O.equals (Elementdata[index])) {fastremove (index); return true; } } return false; } Priva
the container header, the vector is better than deque.
List indicates a non-consecutive memory area, and uses a pair of pointers pointing to the beginning and end elements to link them in two directions, allowing traversal in the forward and backward directions. It is highly efficient to insert and delete elements at any position in the list: the pointer must be
-balancing two-fork tree) How to guarantee the uniqueness of the element? Determines how the elements are ordered, based on whether the return value of the comparison is? Natural ordering in two ways (the element is comparative) enables the class to which the element belongs implements the comparable interface comparer sort (collection With comparison) let the collection receive a comparator implementation class object 2. About whether the collection selection
==0) Break; Monkeys.clear (); for(intI=1; ii) monkeys.push_back (i); Listint>::iterator it=Monkeys.begin (); while(Monkeys.size () >1){ for(intI=1; ii) { ++it; if(it==monkeys.end ()) It=Monkeys.begin (); } It=Monkeys.erase (IT); if(it==monkeys.end ()) It=Monkeys.begin (); } coutEndl;} return 0;}This example is also possible with vectors, because the erase operation of the vector involves the movement of the elements, not the constant time, and the significant difference i
Bidirectional linear list Container # include Copyright NOTICE: This article for Bo Master original article, without Bo Master permission not reproduced. Implementation of "C + +" bidirectional linear linked list container
Tqueue and Tstack, one is the queue list, one is the stack list; One is advanced first out, one is advanced and then out.Tqueue has three main methods and one property:Enqueue (into Row), Dequeue (dequeue), Peek (see the next element to be out);Count (total number of elements).
This example:
Code files:
UnitUnit1;InterfaceusesWindows, Messages, sysutils, variants, Classes, Graphics, Contro
poses a great risk to the program,and list requires explicit data types at the time of definition, so thelist is a strongly typed collection, and the advent of generics avoids data exchange and storage of fashion boxes and unpacking operations, greatly reducing memory loss. Its usage and ArrayList are basically the same. The code is as follows: Summary:Arrays: Arrays can store data in multiple dimensions, stored in the sequential table structure i
"List Interface"Note: "Common Methods""Program Analysis"Note : Be aware of the difference between the Add method and the Set method. "Common Methods"Java.util.Collections provides some static methods to implement some common algorithms based on the list container. (This is not a collection interface, note the distinction)"Common Algorithm Program analysis"java--
http://blog.csdn.net/lucky_bo/article/details/47657641Gson parsing arrays and list containersUsing Gson parsing first needs to join the rack package file: Gson-2.2.4.jarDefine a class of student:public class Student {String name= "Xiao";String sex= "Male";}To define a Java file:public class Listtogson {public static void Main (string[] args) {Student[] people= new Student[]{new Student (), New Student (), New Student ()};arraylistList.add (New Student
Simply write the query and list implementations, and put the code here for later viewing.QueryQueryItem.h#ifndef queueitem#define queueitem#include Query.h#ifndef queue#define queue#include "QueueItem.h" #include Query.cpp#include "Queue.h" template list:ListItem.h#ifndef listitem#define listitem#include List.h#ifndef list#define list#include "ListItem.h" #includ
ArrayList and HashMap are asynchronous, while Vector and HashTable are synchronous. Therefore, Vector and HashTable are thread-safe, while ArrayList and HashMap are not thread-safe. Because synchronization takes machine time, the execution efficiency of Vector and HashTable is lower than that of ArrayList and HashMap. Collection sorted List interface │ ordered List linked
Doing erase in the vector is done in the following steps:Copy ()Destory ();Erase operations in the list containerDestory ()Deallocate ()Vector use in a sense the memory space is only increasing "if not through a technology" and the list is like normal operation, the release is released without releaseMethod of vector reduction:Call swap this is the way to really release memory A.swap (b) method to free mem
Arraylist and hashmap are asynchronous, while vector and hashtable are synchronous. Therefore, vector and hashtable are thread-safe, while arraylist and hashmap are not thread-safe. Because synchronization takes machine time, the execution efficiency of vector and hashtable is lower than that of arraylist and hashmap.Collection├ List Interface│ Linked lists│ ├ Arraylist ordered structure dynamic array class│ Vector Vector│ └ StackSorted set
Map├ Hasht
];arrlength=10;size =0;} publicvoidadd (objectelement) {this.datas[size]=element;// Put the data in the array this.size++;//the number of elements plus a if (this.size>=this.arrlength) {object[]datas2 =newObject[arrLength+10]; System.arraycopy (datas,0,datas2,0,datas.length); this.datas=datas2;//address Substitution}} publicvoidremove (INTNBSP;IDX) {system.arraycopy (This.datas,idx+1,this.datas,idx, this.datas.length-(idx+1)); this.size--;} publicintgetsize () {returnthis.size;} Publicobjectgete
A small test: Using shared_ptr In the STD: List container demonstrates multiple ways to add and delete objects: Using raw pointer and smart pointer) iterator, boost: enable_shared_from_this, etc. The code in this example is only used for demonstration, and only some of the practices can be used in actual use, depending on the needs of the application. Compiled and run in vs2005 and boost_000037_0.
# Includ
I haven't updated my blog for a long time, because I started to learn about Java programming ideas during this time. I hope I can have a deeper understanding of Java so that I can process androidProgramIt can be handy.
Today, when I saw containers in Java, I found some useful things, that is, the comparison of various containers in Java and the conditions for using various containers. I would like to share with you here. This blog is not intended to add descriptive text. It mainly involves seve
Arraylist and hashmap are asynchronous, while vector and hashtable are synchronous. Therefore, vector and hashtable are thread-safe, while arraylist and hashmap are not thread-safe.Because synchronization takes machine time, the execution efficiency of vector and hashtable is lower than that of arraylist and hashmap. collection interface implementation class level shortlist interface linked list ├ arraylist ordered structure dynamic array
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.