For Microsoft PKGoogle, the Linux alliance is hard to find the "profit from"

Microsoft PKGoogle, the Linux alliance is hard to pick up "the benefits of fish"-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. The competition between Microsoft's Windows and Linux has been going on for a long time. Of course, I am afraid it is too much to mention Linux. Objectively speaking, the market share of windows makes it not enough to take Linux seriously, if it is competition, it is only in the server field.

Compared with Linux, Google's threats to Microsoft are obviously times more powerful than Linux. That is to say, the key competitor of Microsoft today is Google, and there is nothing to do with Linux. If Linux can stay away from all kinds of trivial matters in the competition in this environment, of course, it is better to be bigger and stronger, but in fact, in the case of Microsoft and Google, Linux has not been cheap, and it has become increasingly marginalized. Why?

Some may say that Microsoft products are better than Google, or vice versa, but this is one-sided. In fact, Microsoft and Google are not products, but "Concepts ", the concept is higher than the product, prior to the product, and stronger than the product. We can see that the two are mostly rational in the process of mutual PK, not an "arms race". In fact, they are making mutual progress, from the desktop platform to the Web platform, this is an advance of ideas and the direction of the future (from a philosophical point of view, this future is only a stage in history: "cloud computing" is the direction of the future ?), What are we doing in Linux? It is still playing with its own desktop system, thinking about how to defeat Microsoft's Windows. What I want to say is that it is very likely to defeat Windows in the future, but when you beat Windows in Linux, people have already put the focus on the Web platform, and all their products have already implemented online jobs. Most of the products sold in the future will be services rather than software. In this case, is the victory of Linux meaningful?

Therefore, I think the general direction of Linux development is wrong. The increasing strength of Web platforms is a very good thing for Linux, because it does not have to worry about how to be compatible with Windows software, because the Web platform does not differentiate operating systems. If Linux can take full advantage of this opportunity to develop Web applications and develop a few things, such as Silverlight and Flash, then Microsoft and Google may have a headache. However, it is a pity that Linux has not done so, and this is doomed to the fate of Linux.