003| 10,000 hours, kick four dilemma-"letter from Silicon Valley"

Wu in front of the second letter about the "10,000-hour conclusion" understanding of four misunderstandings, namely:

1. Simple repetition
2. Habitual failure
3. The dilemma of Lin Daiyu style
4. Bear Sticks

Below he shared his experience of dealing with such misconceptions, and mentioned that many times, there are no absolutely correct methods and wrong methods, only applicable and not applicable.

He gave the "kick four Dilemma" concise implementation plan.

What is the specific "kick"?

1. First axe, vision-goal-road. Since we practiced for 10,000 hours to raise the promise of excellence, not simply repetition, we need to have a direction, which is the vision. There is a way to achieve the goal, which is the tactic, which is a series of operational steps. I've talked about this before---------time to improve the quality of the program, from writing unit tests to this actionable thing. When a skill is slightly familiar, you may need to do something new and challenging to reach the next goal, and in any company, the leader is welcome to the people who are constantly challenging themselves to go up.
2. The second axe, even if it is not pleasant to hear, try to find out the reasonableness of it. This has three meanings: the first level of
   • is the equivalent of what we are talking about today as a transposition.
   • The second layer means that everything should be used to go back and think twice. For example, someone who speaks to you--the first thing you may feel is a complete nonsense; but, be sure to think twice, whether I was wrong, he was right, this time thinking, must not assume that he is right, if you think twice, or feel that they are wrong, to think of the third time, whether my state is not enough to understand him. Why do you think about this third time? Because anyone who wants to be diligent, and more than their own strong people, if all day and chess withered son chess, only the more smelly. Since it is with people who are stronger than themselves, the third situation is likely to happen, so this time may as well enter-step communication, in-depth understanding of the other side that reason. If you do this often, you can avoid habitual failure.
   • The third layer means that even if the other person is really talking nonsense, think about why he said so to find out the rationality. If we can always find the rationality in the words, we not only progress fast, but also the vision, bearing will be much larger than the average person, will not fall into Lin Daiyu's plight. This seems not easy to do, but my approach is very simple, every time I meet someone and I have different opinions, immediately start to find the other side of the rationality of the switch, until the reasonableness of the other side. I don't know if there is obsessive-compulsive disorder, but it's really good for my progress. On the contrary, when the other side of the view and we-to, but do not need to find rationality to let themselves complacent.
3. The third axe is to make a record of everything so that the bear can be avoided. Anyone who does any professional job, such as an engineer, an accountant, a lawyer, will encounter some difficult problems and solve these problems, and we will progress. Another advantage of doing the recording is that, in the process of recording, thinking again-all the time, progress will be faster.

003| Another 10,000 hours, kick four dilemma-"letter from Silicon Valley"