Watching TV yesterday, two people in the debate, in fact, the problem is very simple, but I do not remember anything, only see them in the noisy, the core of the quarrel is that you are wrong with me.
Think of peacetime, we in the project management, facing the programmer colleague, win the red-faced time, our thinking is not also already wrong?
When it comes to communication, there is only one thing to consider: what kind of results do we have to achieve.
Keep in mind the key points in this:
Reach Out!
Reached!
Reached!
When we use argumentative thinking, we tend to argue.
Work is not a debate game, we need to solve the problem.
When your thinking angle changes from controversy to construction, the problem tends to be solved rather than proving you wrong. At this point we will put down the so-called right and wrong, but think about how to solve.
There is a concept in the law of attraction where you can get what you care about.
So when you start thinking, the first thing you want to think about is what your purpose is. is to solve the problem, understand the other person's meaning, and then integrate their own ideas to reach a conclusion, make things feasible. Not in the other side of the point of view, become you to my wrong argument, so as to prove their right, in such a premise, cooperation is impossible to achieve.
In such a word, humans laugh at the thought of God. In fact, I have not understood the meaning of this word in the end. Until a few years ago I found that my thinking is quite confused, only to find that their thinking is always around, is tangled to tangle, think half a day can not get out what things. If this is the way of thinking, there is no suggestion of meaning. It's strange that God doesn't laugh.
I am Milo, ten years old driver of software development, feel the article useful, please point reprint, have to cure waist pain secret, add Q573581882 pick.
A change of mindset helps you to achieve cooperation