For 23rd Baidu issued the "on the Chain Cheat algorithm Upgrade" announcement, I believe that a lot of people are serious research, because every time the upgrade of Baidu algorithm deeply affect us these grassroots webmaster, if we ignore a point, it is likely to wait for us is K station, before the efforts in vain. For the official things are mostly cover, a lot of places are not clearly expressed clearly, the following Pange put forward on the fight against the chain cheat some of the questions, hope to get everyone's answer.
One, how to identify which links are paid to buy or sell
For a large number of purchase or sale of the chain of course very good to distinguish, for the purchase or sale of the chain is nothing but high PR one-way point to low PR site, but do not rule out a small number of stationmaster is mutual understanding, such as to engage in a one-sided friendship chain is not impossible, if some webmaster well-connected One of his new stations is likely to get high PR site links, for this situation, it is really difficult to distinguish. Even the establishment of the "Wealth Group" to investigate the economic flow of both sides is not much of a role. For this kind of situation, I think probably all is to see "character", if you have good character, it's OK. Otherwise be wronged, k you a half month, you also have no way.
Ii. What is a worthless Web page and site
The "algorithm upgrade on hyper-chain cheating" bulletin points to the fight "by creating a large number of worthless pages or sites built by the cross wheel chain". What is the standard for a search engine to identify worthless Web pages or sites? We all know that worthless pages are pages that don't help users, but each page is for a particular user, and the information inside each page contains more or less value. There are search engines to capture web pages, like the elephant, for the Web page is not very valuable to have a true and accurate decision.
There is the same industry in the cross-wheel chain is not cheating? For the same industry of the cross wheel chain is like Taobao, between the merchants are in mutual brush reputation, for mutual brush reputation, Taobao also has a Alipay and let's do monitoring, that search engine discrimination based on what?
Third, unrelated sites leave links are not punished
"On the algorithm upgrade of the chain cheat" there is a more classic phrase "The deliberate manipulation of specific blows includes but is not limited to the following examples", which should be noted as "but not limited to". It's just that there are some hyper-chain cheats that haven't been listed yet. For example, the medical profession in the Webmaster forum left a large number of links is it possible to receive punishment? In the major Webmaster forum can see the General people reply to the post is completely without content, directly to the six or seven unrelated links put up, for this approach, hard if said to have a role, is only to attract search engines to the target site crawling, or increase the exposure rate of the site. But this is not a punishment now, and will certainly be negatively affected in the future.
Four, have been added to the hidden links of the site has not received punishment
Cheat chain Cheating for "by scanning site vulnerabilities in high-quality sites to add hidden links," The site is punished, the punishment is taken for granted. But for those high quality sites by others hanging black chain has not been adversely affected? In general, the Web site is linked to black chain is a great negative impact. However, since it is known to be linked to the black chain, why the victims have to punish, it is like being robbed by someone else to be punished, this is not very innocent?
Finally want to say is that the search engine or maintain the interests of most people, as long as you to search engines, you have good character, search engine is not to hurt you. Only those who want to play with the search engine webmaster, most of them are to play their own death.
Article by Shenzhen website Design http://www.netpai.com (Pange) original, reprint please indicate the source