Advanced database-oriented language

Although Visual FoxPro has not been used in nearly 10 years, FOXPRO has fallen and Microsoft has no longer developed it. Some of them are open-source in codeplex.

However, I always miss VFP and can directly operate databases. It is also an advanced structured/Object-based advancedProgramThe design language makes it as convenient to use the database and memory variables. Unlike operating the database in advanced languages, it requires O/R mapping to be connected. VFP is inherently not subject to impedance mismatch.

C # (H or other advanced languages, such as VB.net)They do not haveDatabaseToDatabaseThe processing is through. Net fr In the amework SDK DatabaseProgramming class library. Among them, ADO. NET is also. Net fr An important part of the amework SDK.

What we need is more than just LINQ. We hope the language can process the database itself.

For example, C #. Net has such an extension.

Datatable

{

String (8) Name; // The name is a string of 8 characters.

INT (2) age; // The age is an integer of two digits.

Flloat () height; // The unit of height is meters, an integer of 1, and two decimal places.

Sex gender

String (18) id not null; // ID card number

Keyword

}

 

Enum sex

{Male, femail}

 

 

Database and memory variables are the same, direct operations, what a wonderful thing!

In the hope that. Net can have a database-oriented High-level programming language.

You can either use an object-oriented database or an advanced database-Oriented Object Language.

 

Why do programmers need to deal with O/R problems? This should not have been done by programmers. Advanced languages and databases are capable of doing well.

Programmers design, code, test, and work overtime every day. They need to keep up with the technical needs, and their wages are not high. I have always thought that software development is a kind of inhuman torture and abuse for most people.

To reduce the programmer's work intensity and improve the treatment, the programmer should focus only on the business logic and scientific issues, rather than the same repetition.

Software development itself is designed to reduce the intensity of repetitive work, while software developers are quite repetitive and tedious, which is a bit ironic.