Are you suitable for interactive design?

"Interaction designers need to have the ability to imagine complex behavior," says Alan Cooper. "Nail the true meaning of interactive design: to speculate on scenarios that might occur. Does this also mean that interactive design relies entirely on the sixth sense of ambiguity?

Fortunately, we have the ability to be called "reasoning", which allows us to figure out the rules based on available data to speculate on what might happen.

To do such a thing, Sherlock Holmes is best at.

But in my opinion, interaction design is similar to what Sherlock Holmes would do: to understand product objectives, to study users and products, to discover the laws of users when they use products, to speculate about the user's mental model, and to make design decisions.

In this case, it takes only two conditions to make the right design decision:

1, enough information;

2, super strong reasoning ability.

About the information, we can only go to the ground to collect and refine. But if you get enough information, can you work out the design challenges you face?

Let's take a look at the following famous logic question:

There are five rooms with five different colours;

A person of different nationalities lives in each room;

Everyone is drinking a particular brand of drink, smoking a specific brand of cigarettes, raising a specific pet;

No two people are smoking the same brand of cigarettes, drinking the same brand of beverages, or keeping the same pet.

The known clues are as follows:

1. The British live in a red house;

2. Swedes keep dogs as pets;

3. Danish tea;

4. The green house next to the White House, on the left of the White House;

5. The owner of the Green house drinks coffee;

6. The person who smokes the Pallmall brand cigarette raises the bird;

7. The people in the Yellow House smoke the Dunhill brand cigarette;

8. People who live in the middle of the house drink milk;

9. The Norwegian people live in the first house (leftmost);

10. The person who smokes blends cigarette is adjacent to the person who raises the description;

11. The person who raises the horse is adjacent to the person who smokes Dunhill brand cigarette;

12. People who smoke bluemaster cigarettes drink beer;

13. The Germans smoked Prince brand cigarettes;

14. Norwegians are adjacent to those living in blue houses;

15. People who smoke blends cigarettes are adjacent to those who drink mineral water;

The answer you need to find is: who keeps the fish as a pet?

When you have finished this problem, ask yourself two questions:

1, do you like to do such a reasoning question?

2. Are you good at this kind of reasoning problem?

If you like and Excel, then there is no doubt that you are fit to do the work of summing up the law from the multitude; if you like it but you are not good at it, I'm afraid I need to strengthen this training; If you don't like it, but you're good at it, maybe you should treat your work and hobbies differently; If you don't like it, you're not good at it. Uh...... You have a few opinions.

Now draw a two-dimensional matrix to see where you are in this matrix. In general, the upper-right corner is + +, which means both are strong, and the lower-left corner is--to indicate that both items are weak.

I am very happy to find that I am more suitable for this job.

So, where do you fall?

Article Source: angela.ucdchina.com reprint Please indicate the source link.