Arts in the Sandbox middle school

In fact, I do not want to use this title at the beginning, I originally wanted to be in the sandbox middle school philosophy, later found that they are not too heroic, too tweaked, plus the last time and a debate on the argument, I will talk about this later. So I wanted to expand the title and become a liberal arts school. I speak of the concept of liberal arts should still originate from high school, so-called science students can be the book of the arts as extracurricular books to see, the arts students can only be the book of science as waste paper this said. So I was conditioned to the book of all the text of the subject is called the arts. The book is drawn in the chart XYZ and so on especially with the rational thinking of some called science.

Sandbox is a computer concept refers to a program in a separate environment, and humans harmless let him run, test his external behavior, see if it is a virus and so on, so is a separate closed environment is suitable for testing malicious code, even if the problem can be limited to a manageable range. My explanation may not be in place or I understand not deep, the experts do not have to criticize, this time I do not want to discuss technology, simply say something else. I began to come into contact with philosophy as if it was full of contempt and scorn, not to say how this subject, but to learn his people. Right is the so-called philosophical students, not philosophers.

The motive of this article is that this semester, an elective course called Happiness Psychology, I think this should be the category of psychology, and philosophy is not related to, then the first class went, found that the teacher said things began irrelevant. The first lesson has a trap, the teacher put a song, very want to let us follow the song to Swing hands, girls of course quickly into the role, the whole classroom is the new year. However, the boy may be shy. Hands on the table without face, and then the teacher played a trick, she let the song continue to put, and then said to play a game bar, on both sides of the students push others hand, said that you are more interested in the point you push the past. The programmer's thinking immediately up, if push the left right side will not be happy, push the right left side will not be happy to think that you are despise me. Then you have to push me a little bit. By the end of his goal, let's swing our hands and listen to the song, OK. I have realized, so decisive not face, sitting on the edge of the position up. Actually, someone might ask me why I'm not with each other. Hey, I'm not a gregarious person? No, I just don't want that kind of atmosphere, that kind of people floating in the air feeling, I want to be practical. It's easier to fall off the top than to go up. The teacher said that she was about to go to the United States to do an experiment, probably in the near future will appear in our hero reading comprehension, a study shows that people are in some circumstances will somehow happy up, originally because of a certain, they find two groups of students how how. So psychology, the fall.

Then there was the debate, and this was about a friend of mine, the President of the debate. That day she said she was going to be a judge and was dragged by one side to delay her supper and gave her a little bit of my opinion on the debate. Said the debate seems to be fighting eggplant and tomatoes which is delicious, it is clear that everyone's taste is different to say the other side of the bad eat, and then on the two kinds of taste, nutrition and so on to say a pass, more exasperating is clearly the debate is that he is supporting the tomato, this side of the argument every meal less eggplant is not. The spirit of the mentality of the sister to say, more exasperating is obviously go to play also make Rqan eat not good supper. Then prompted me to think of a winter vacation is also she told me that the question is whether Kang-gan prosperity is a veritable. I think this is not a topic to be debated, but a subject of inquiry. First of all, what are the names, and what are the real ones, but look at the relationship between them. If you keep arguing about the names, it's not a debate, it's about eggplant and tomatoes. If it's in contention, it's archaeology. If both are clear, what's the fight? One might say, for example, that he has a real, but not a name that corresponds to him. Well, that's not really true, so I'd say it's a word for what it means. However, the definition of the word is never accurate, the ancient people do not set up a relationship to define the meaning of a word, congruent is true, part of the equal is not, if not to fight for a death, like in a plus first not equal to two do not know the case of paranoia to solve an equation. But they were so busy. So the debate fell.

In fact, it is literature, this has to mention our high school language teacher, I think of his a mantra, in speaking of a word a poem, always said, wonderful Ah, it is marvelous, students you carefully understand. Really, teacher, I really feel that the poem is well written. But, since the good is not to say, is it a fart? Say the so-called Chinese poetry appreciation Bar, always said, this sentence fully expressed what the author of the mood, in fact, I really know that he is to express feelings, but why she expressed good, and then the teacher is to tell us, he wrote this kind of situation depicted incisively and vividly, the teacher I really know he portrayed well, But why is it well painted? This must not be answered by the teacher. Imaginative achievement here inexpressible of course can't say anything about it. But, just what we write something out, notice Yanzhiyouwu, of course, I think this article is not in the moan. Students of the same age students do not I believe that there will be much deeper experience, only because more knowledge of a word, with a few parallelism, attracted a few metaphors of the composition will be advertised as an essay, then is not with the language is just the tool of expression of feelings back. I really like to write very good things, although it is not the reason, but I do not want to cobwebs a sentence in a living apart to analyze why he is good, this way of learning literature, literature fell.

Politics, has always been the downfall.

What I'm talking about is nothing in the sandbox middle school, they share a body of flesh, and then deal with something different. Like, the psychology of people will be depressed, a debate president to help each other to write a manuscript, we will not see the GanJiang on the Tengwang Pavilion want to poem, a pig will not sit in front of the copilot on the foot. Finally, I would like to mention the philosophy, there is no more than philosophy to speak of the sandbox, and seldom see some people because of the philosophy of the mad, philosophy is not necessarily crazy, crazy philosopher must have learned in. In addition to a mouthful of professional vocabulary will have nothing, but good, put into the sandbox, easy to watch and play. If you let these things run through your head all over the horse. I'm afraid there are several crazy.

　　

Arts in the Sandbox middle school