[Clear information] between real and false: Discussion on the right and right of Enterprise Architecture

When it comes to Enterprise Architecture (EA), there are often several reactions: "advanced", "mysterious", "how to implement" virtual ". So what is the enterprise architecture? What problems can Enterprise Architecture solve? Is it true that it is "fake big empty?

First, enterprises need an architecture.

Order disorder is a deep-rooted idea of mankind. In daily life, we often hear such reports: the gas pipeline is cut off when the water supply pipe is repaired, and the gas pipeline is accidentally cut off during gas construction. Instead, the cable and communication pipeline are cut off 10 times in two months ...... Why is repairing a line vulnerable to other problems? On the one hand, city planning is gradual, and drawings only reflect one or more lines. No one can clearly describe the complex underground pipe network, it is difficult to grasp the overall planning process of a first-line road. On the other hand, the drawings are outdated, coupled with natural factors such as pipeline displacement caused by changes in the underground environment, at the same time, it is not ruled out that there are illegal operations by the construction party, and the problem arises.

Ing to the enterprise is also the case. Information technology (IT) has become an indispensable part of supporting strategic planning for enterprises. However, the development process of IT systems in enterprises is also like the construction of urban infrastructure, it is always generated along with a specific business demand. Due to the lack of overall planning, as enterprises continue to grow, IT system types are constantly increasing, and management fees and O & M fees expand, at the same time, features are repeatedly built, information is separated, and the integration relationship is intricate ...... These problems make the business and it farther and farther away. Therefore, a solid, meticulous, and elastic skeleton is essential for the enterprise's sustainable development and competitiveness.

Second, enterprise architecture planning is not a panacea for enterprises.

There are two common attitudes towards enterprise architecture. First, we believe that the implementation of enterprise architecture can solve the problems faced by the existing informatization construction; the second is that only a pile of drawings are produced after implementation, which is easily shelved. The method theory is too weak to be implemented. Both of them made the same mistake, believing that only Enterprise Architecture Planning or enterprise architecture can solve all problems once and for all in the short term.

For more than 30 years since the 1980s s, there has been no standard definition of enterprise architecture, but the only thing people agree that, this term from the construction field is used to solve how to develop and effectively implement the business strategy to the IT strategy. Execution is the only method verified by this theory. In general, the execution of enterprise architecture projects in the architecture governance stage is the time to test the enterprise management level and recognition of the enterprise architecture. At this time, not only do we need a strong pushing force and system, we also need to use a good platform and tool to control the governance process. From the recognition of corporate strategies and the clear vision of the architecture, to the design of solutions and Evolution Routes, to governance and architecture change, this process will persist through iteration, therefore, this is a process of gradual and orderly operation. In the future, we will introduce in detail what is effective execution.

Furthermore, the enterprise architecture theory helps organizations change their perspectives on problems.

In the past, a major investigation was required for a change in a certain function to find out what would be affected. Even if such information was not necessarily accurate, in most cases, the change personnel will not consider the impact of the change. Implementing the enterprise architecture can form a complete set of architecture assets that include key management elements, highly consistent standards, and multidimensional analysis of the enterprise. Business Processes, application systems, and data information are mutually related, without a cover-up presentation, we can know from any dimension how information in other fields is transferred and working. At the same time, strong standards will support the rapid establishment of new systems. In combination with the corresponding management system, enterprise organizations begin to focus on the changes around the enterprise strategy from multiple dimensions, changing the way they look at problems from a single perspective in the past.

The management theory is "virtual". Only by penetrating the management theory into daily life and work, facing up to problems, and using the management method to execute it can it be "real ".

What is your understanding of the enterprise architecture?

[Clear information] between real and false: Discussion on the right and right of Enterprise Architecture