Three months later, Daniel Brandt, head of the Google-watch.org website, attacked Google's proud PageRank algorithm and blamed the company for its lack of equality and democracy. Brandt urged the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate Google rankings and use Google rankings as a public business constraint. The reason is that Google actually controls the natural resources of Internet access. Mainstream media dismissed Brandt, but he still received a lot of support online. As far as the search engine is concerned, Google is almost dedicated.
In late October, two Harvard investigators reported that Google rankings had begun filtering out the company's servers to block access to certain websites from users in Germany, France, and Switzerland, because these websites contain content that may be viewed as racial or inflammatory in their country. Google rankings are not mentioned in the top-down ranking.
After these incidents, Google's loyal technical users began to doubt the company's motives. "I have some thoughts on Google's recent rankings," said Brian Osborne, a news website writer. "Google rankings must comply with German and French laws. Although I can understand this, its current practice has pushed itself to a very dangerous situation ."
Google is currently the world's largest and most popular search engine. In addition to powerful technical strength, the success of Google's ranking has a simple principle: "reject evil ". Moreover, they are gradually realizing that moral compromise is a must-have cost for a bigger business.
In the initial stage, Brin and Page worked closely together to share all the roles of the company. Page studied all the popular search engines at that time and concluded that the paths of these engines were wrong. He believes that the best way is to use a large amount of hyperlink information that already exists on the network.
In 2001, Google's ranking was at risk. Page and Brin believed that they should establish a stricter corporate structure system. Page gave Schmidt the CEO's position, and then served as the company's president together with Brin. In this way, Page has time to focus on its product development talent, brin's inherent enthusiasm for controlling the overall situation also makes him naturally pay more attention to Google's growth and growing reputation.
That is to say, Brin's political and policy points will have a great impact on Google's ranking. When talking about his decisions and values, Brin mentions the word "useful" at most. Although the decisions made by Google in the past year are somewhat casual, we found that these decisions are beginning to show their rationality when looking at the "practical first" world perspective, in Brin's words, we need to look at the whole world ".
By making concessions with some governments, Google's rankings in these countries still serve Internet users and even maintain advertising revenue. So is Google ranking too easy to compromise on scientific arguments? From a legal perspective, Google is indeed stuck: to avoid legal liability, they must remove the link to trouble.
However, Google rankings have not actually been completely compromised. They have found a two-pronged approach: when a chain in accordance with the law should be removed, although Google rankings follow orders, however, the link is connected to another website, Chilling Effects. If you are interested, you can follow the provided url.
