CSDN Future website content Tag architecture conjecture

Architecture

Blog:http://blog.csdn.net/ericlee00/archive/2006/07/15/925386.aspx

Probably last week, wrote a blog subjective analysis of csdn current content structure, received a lot of friends good comments and suggestions, first of all thank them. The network changes really very quickly, now the content structure of the website is 2, 3 years ago already had the tremendous change. Many people have also suggested that "today's web media has shifted from content-driven to technology-driven." "That's true, Tag,rss,blog,wiki,digg, and so on. New media forms have completely broken the original simply by the editor through the CMS Post. The network has become more interactive, the value of the individual is now fully reflected in the network media. So how will Csdn's content architecture evolve? I made a bold guess, of course it was just my subjective idea.

In writing this blog, I suddenly have some doubt: rely solely on technology will be able to make a network media always stay ahead? What is the core value of network media? Google,myspace, this emerging network service provider, can not be called the media? At the end of this article, I would like to briefly discuss my point of view.

First of all, let me say a few words about the csdn of the future content of the structure of the speculation. I made a picture, hoping to help you understand. At present, there are quite a number of excellent vertical professional website, such as: Itpub,javaeye, Blog Park and so on, so csdn should not push the brand to compete with them. Around CSDN This single brand push service, and they form complementary advantages, mutual cooperation, is an optional direction of development.

CSDN Service layer: Includes blog,wiki,live (video), Digg (News), Bbs,paper (technical Manual), people (Developer Circle), search, etc. Users can directly and actively participate in these services, users and can interact with the acquisition of the content needed to create.

CSDN Tag System: Tag is the smallest unit of meaning content. Tag system is currently the major media in the direction of research, the value is very large. There are many articles about tag system on the Internet. I am only here to abstract my own understanding. As pictured.

I understand tag as 2 levels. The content of the tag, the service generated by the content of the tag aggregation, to tag for the nodes linked together. Allow readers to classify content according to their own habits, theoretically readers can traverse all the content they want to see through tag. To the reader's tag, the CSDN each reader's behavior to do tag. A person may have multiple tag tags, so that each reader can easily through the tag to find and their own like-minded people, forming a developer circle. Theoretically, a reader can traverse all the people he wants to find by tag.

CSDN all tag: on the content and people after the tag, and then to tag as a node, a tag contains all the content around it and all the people, the whole CSDN through the tag woven into a net.

Aggregation tag Form column: For a Web site that serves only as a service, I think it's OK to get all the content and people back together in the last step, but it may take another step to be a medium. Is the aggregation of tag to form a column with CSDN characteristics. Through sharp observation found in the IT circle of hot spots, with tag as a tool to quickly extract hot content. Csdn as a media, should do this step. CSDN should convey a voice of their own, telling readers the real it circle, telling them what they have in the IT circle, which is noteworthy, and telling them where they can get the information they need.

This is my csdn future content architecture of some ideas, if there are different views are very welcome to make comments and suggestions. Finally, I'd like to talk about the questions at the beginning of this article.
Does relying solely on technology make it possible for a network media to stay ahead forever?
At present, network technology can be said to change rapidly, any company has the opportunity to pass a certain technology to surpass others, but now technology more and more transparent, in addition to a few companies, most of the site's technology should not be too different, the only difference may be only the use of a certain technology.

What is the core value of network media?
Network media, I think since it is zoned to the media, it should have the characteristics of the media. The media is to spread the idea, perhaps this thought is created by the editor, perhaps by the user to create and then refined by the editor, or even the spontaneous creation of the user to extract. Whatever the form, I think the core value of the media is thought. The media and the media are different, that is, the idea of communication is different. In the current network era, the content of similar sites has become increasingly small, the competition may be who is more good at organizing content who thought more depth. This is a good example of the World Cup's several major portal sites.

Google,myspace, this emerging network service provider, can not be called the media?
These two sites, are now very hot, the latest news, MYSAPCE traffic has surpassed Google, became one of the hottest sites. They also provide many services, and the quality of service and technical strength should also be one of the strongest websites in the world. However, under the Google brand, do you know where the technology trend is now? Maybe not. They're just a platform, and it doesn't give you any guidance, and Google will help you only when you know what you're doing. So I don't think they're media.

The above is just a simple idea of the above question, perhaps will also write, I hope to communicate with you.