Csdn future website content tag architecture Conjecture

Probably last week, I wrote a blog to analyze the current content architecture of csdn and received comments and suggestions from many friends. I would like to express my gratitude to them first. The Network has changed rapidly, and the content architecture of the website has changed dramatically over the past two or three years ago. Many people have also suggested that "Today's online media has changed from content-driven to technology-driven ." Indeed, new media formats such as tag, RSS, blog, wiki, and Digg have completely broken the original process of posting articles through CMS by editing. the Internet has become more interactive, and personal values have been fully reflected by the current online media. how will the content architecture of csdn develop? I guessed it. Of course, this is only my subjective idea.

When I wrote this blog, I suddenly had some questions: Is it true that relying solely on technology can keep a network media company ahead forever? What are the core values of online media? Can Google and MySpace, such emerging network service providers, be called media? At the end of this article, I would like to share some of my views.

First, let me talk about the conjecture about the future content organization architecture of csdn. I made a picture, hoping to help you understand it. At present, there are already quite a few excellent vertical professional websites in China, such as itpub, javaeye, and blog Park. Therefore, csdn should not promote brand competition with them. The single-brand PUSH Service around csdn is an optional development direction to complement and cooperate with each other.

 

 

Csdn service layer: includesBlog, wiki, live (video), Digg (News), BBS, paper (Technical Manual), people (developer circle), search and so on. Users can directly participate in these services. Users can interact with each other to obtain the content they need.

Csdn tag system:Tag is the smallest unit of meaningful content. The tag system is currently under research by various media and has great value. There are also many articles about the tag system on the Internet. Here I will only abstract my understanding ..

I understand the tag as two layers.Tag of content,Aggregates the content produced by the service with tags and associates them with each other as nodes. Users can classify content according to their habits. In theory, users can traverse all the content they want to see through tags.For the reader's tag,Tag the behavior of each csdn reader. A person may have multiple tag tags, so that every reader can easily find people who share their interests through tags to form a developer circle. In theory, a reader can traverse all the people he wants to find through tags.

All tags of csdn:After the content and people are tagged separately, a tag is taken as a node. A tag contains all the content and everyone around it. The entire csdn is woven into a network by TAG.

Columns formed by aggregation tags:For a website only for the purpose of providing services, I think it is enough to re-aggregate all the content and people in the previous step, but it may take another step to serve as a media. Is to aggregate tags to form a topic with the characteristics of csdn. Through keen observation, we can find hot spots in the IT circle and use tags as a tool to quickly extract hot content. As a media set, csdn should take this step. Csdn should convey its own voice, tell readers the true it circle, tell them what is in the IT circle, and tell them where they can get the desired information.

This is my thoughts on csdn's future content architecture. If you have different opinions, I would like to welcome comments and suggestions from other users. Finally, I 'd like to talk about the problems at the beginning of this article.
Does relying solely on technology make an online media always take the lead?
Currently, network technology can be said to be changing with each passing day. Any company has the opportunity to surpass others instantly through a certain technology. However, today's technology is becoming more and more transparent, except for a few companies, the technology of the vast majority of websites should not be much different. The only difference may be that the technology is used successively.

What are the core values of online media?
Network Media, I think it should have the characteristics of media. Media is about to spread the idea. Maybe this idea was created by editors, maybe by netizens, and then extracted by editors, or even by netizens. Regardless of the form, I think the core value of media is thought. Different from the media, the media has different ideas. In the current Internet era, the content differentiation of similar websites has become increasingly small. The competition may be that the idea of who is better at organizing content is more profound. The report on several major portal websites during the World Cup is a good example.

Can Google and MySpace, such emerging network service providers, be called media?
These two websites are currently very popular. The latest news shows that mysapce traffic has exceeded Google and has become one of the hottest websites. They also provide many services, and the service quality and technical strength should also be one of the most powerful websites in the world. However, under the Google brand, do you know the current technical trends? Maybe not. They are just a platform. They cannot provide you with any guidance. Google will help you only when you know what you want to do. So I don't think they are media.

The above is just a simple idea of the above problem. Maybe I will write it later and hope to communicate with you.