DC and software requirements

Recently, air hunters are preparing to buy a DC.
Every day, I went around to find relevant information, read technical indicators and articles about N types of DC, and kept asking questions on QQ, MSN, and Gtalk, I hate to add all the DC functions on the market to him.
Of course there is no such DC on the one to be purchased, and even the highest-end DSLR cannot provide all of this.

This reminds me a long time ago
In software companies, the company's philosophy is to meet user needs. As we continued to provide various BT functions in software, competitors in this field gradually failed to keep up with me.
They have to leave this field. However, our company's results are not good, because the addition of too many functions without practical use, so that the core functions are overwhelmed, and the product is huge and bulky, although sold,
But it was not actually used by the customer, and because the system was too complex, resulting in a huge cost of post-maintenance, the company ended up being merged.

The crux of the two problems is the same: the user's own goals are not clear.

I don't want to talk about things with hunters. Let's talk about the software. First, software users do not know what the software can do for them at first, or they do not know what problems are suitable for software solutions. In this case, when multiple software vendors provide software with slightly different functions, he will certainly want a software with all these functions, or even more.

Another
On the one hand, software companies are not familiar with the real needs of users. They cannot figure out which functions are really needed by users, so they have to do everything and the results are not all good. At this point, the DC manufacturer is doing better.
Each DC has its own accurate positioning: DSLR is available for real professional users, and there are different levels according to their needs, while for amateur users there are a wide variety of DC, for example, for girls
Card machines focus more on image quality and functions for boys. Photography enthusiasts have models with manual functions and semi-professional options for high-end consumers. Users are not
More functions may be required at the same price, and an added aspect must be sacrificed, at this time, he will further analyze which functions are more important to himself.

However
After all, software and DC are different. Especially for most users who are familiar with pirated software, there is basically no concept of the relationship between software functions and prices, so it is easier to get confused than DC users. This
When I think software companies should learn from DC vendors, they need to make it clear that all the functions are implemented at a cost, and then let users assess whether they are willing to pay the appropriate price for it, the result is as follows:
The result may be close to the actual requirement. However, the problem is that, if a competitor like my original company provides implementation regardless of the user's requirements, the competition will be
Disadvantage.

Therefore, making software is much more complicated than selling DC, and the technology is relatively high. However, from another perspective, there may be more potential profits-of course, the entire company may also be lost.