I. Main Interface: many elements have been rewritten. For example, although xpmenu can be used for menus, some special elements are added. The attribute column on the Left can be used for Treeview, but it can also be rewritten.
And the page display is overwritten ,...
I don't know why I have to spend so much effort on the interface to be nice. However, it is not comparable to popular development tools.
<
BR> II. Main Functions
1. Edit UML, er, TFD, and other elements to generate a multi-language frameworkCode.
2
Edit flowchart to generate C ++ code.
3. Support for reverse engineering in Java, C #, and C ++
4
Edit the syntax element to become a visual
Parser with C ++ and XML Parser
From the above functions, DD is comparable to power in code generation.
Code Generation engine for designer and Rose.
5
Teamwork, real-time engineering group collaboration.
3. Features
1
integrated with BBS
2. Rich code generation targets (bcb6, vc6, vc7, C #, Delphi, Java, dev
C ++) to generate an absolutely engine
3 easy-to-expand framework. Except for UML
, all other elements are extended, Source Code is provided. You can expand the elements as needed.
4. Reverse Engineering. Including C ++, Java,
C #. You can also see flowchart
5. A lot of useful code is open-source, such as the implementation of delegation in various languages. VC, BCB,
C #, Delphi, and Java delegation scheme
4. Plan
1. Now C ++ has been completed,
JAVA, the C # parser is not far from the compiler, so it is planned to create a programming language and a running platform. I was thinking, isn't it better to open source? the premise of open source is that there are sufficient volunteer participants
2. Support for uidesign
3.
reverse SQL
4. Generate a form based on the DB, some open templates.
5. Change the name of duceland studio.