I have always been clear about replies to Forum posts. However, unfamiliar friends certainly do not understand and may feel a little strange. Here, we will describe it here.
For some questions, whether it is simple or difficult, I have two attitudes when I will, one is to give an answer, and the other is to let the questioner supplement the foundation.
What is the difference? All are the statuses shown by the questioner.
If the problem is simple and the performance of the questioner is just a beginner, I will patiently explain and help him learn. In turn, if the questioner is already working and is working on a very formal project, then it is very easy to ask (of course, the questioner himself may not or may find it difficult) basic questions, you cannot forgive me. In this case, I can only tell him to add the foundation that should be mastered. Because the foundation is not strong, it cannot be reflected only in a specific problem, but does not know how many foundations are not mastered. Therefore, simply solving this problem cannot make him better competent for his work. If he wants to rely on free answers from the Forum to finish his work without learning, the thought of this parasite cannot be pampered. To put it bluntly, if such a situation is popularized, the software industry will be destroyed, which is no exaggeration.
If the problem is difficult, and the questioner demonstrates some basic experience and efforts made to solve the problem, I will patiently explain it, including a variety of solutions and comparison of advantages and disadvantages (for beginners, they generally do not talk too much, so that they do not understand what is in place and are at a loss ). In turn, if the questioner still does not have the foundation he should have, he should do his best not to work hard first. I should either ask him to turn back to supplement the foundation, or criticize him for this kind of hard-earned attitude that he does not want to learn.
In a word, it is not worth my help if you do not study hard. In addition, I have to criticize it in a "Multi-Event" manner. I think this is the responsibility of a real technician or technology enthusiast. If you don't agree, I can't find a reason to understand. Only contempt is needed. I never fear or mean to sacrifice my own interests for the long-term real public interests. If someone finds it pedantic, I think he is very stupid in terms of big aspects.