Different interpretations of the average transaction response time of LR analysis and the time value in summary

& I have ignored the thinking time here.

 

Check the liboys transaction here.. Remember them first.

Let's look at the time value of the liboys transaction in this figure.And remember them.

Look at this average Transaction Response TimeSampling Time:

Granularity

2Seconds. Now I change to: 115Second (the running time of the entire scenario ).

Let's take a look at average transaction response time.Graph.

Here, I will try min, Ave, Max again.Columns are displayed.

Graph?Is the maximum, minimum, and average of the same?

Is it with summary?Is the average value in the same way?

Is it four points?

 

 

What I want to say is:

 

SummaryThe maximum, average, and minimum values of the timeline diagram are different from those of the average transaction response time because the sampling is different.

Average transaction time, in this example, the default value is 2Seconds.

If their sampling time is the same, the average will be the same.

SummaryThe average is based on the time of the entire scenario. The maximum and minimum values are also obtained from the entire scenario.

The average transaction response time is measured by frequency. These two values are not comparable. It does not matter.

It's just a different calculation method for a bunch of data. During the sampling time, it may be worse than summaryHigh in, may be low, may be flat, this is very accidental.