Don't use tactical diligence to cover up strategic laziness.

rebels said, "You'redon't use tactical diligence to cover up strategic laziness ."How do you understand this sentence?" he said. What does this bring to our inspiration?

Today Zhiyun-Dori The small series of CRM system with everyone to read about tactical diligence and strategic laziness.

The so-called strategy is why we should do this thing.

The so-called tactic is how to do this thing.

As in the following sentence:

Choice than effort more important, doing the right thing is more important than doing it right.

Let's take an example and read the story and believe that we all understand tactical diligence and strategic laziness.

A gang of people drive into the big desert, the result is good dead car broke down, the car sat four guys, including two of them on the spot on the scene.

One of them took out a compass, a compass, a map, a click.

The last one is equipped with a hat, scarf, shoes, drinking water, in the back of a click of the activity muscles, by the way also coated with sunscreen. Put down a sentence I go, find an oasis to go.

Jaybird ran away.

The three people in the car did not hold him, let him run. Five minutes later, fiddling with the map the man said slowly, the direction of the Oasis should be the opposite direction ah.

Get off and find that run brother, only the desert giant Kusakabe a small black spot, and then this buddy together with those two Meng, loudly said, you come back, you can not afford to come.

Then this forced to think that everyone and his farewell, but also ecstasy waved.

Run, brother.

I can't believe it's goodbye.

This day-to-day running brother, his action is reflected in his tactical level of diligence, but he at his strategic level, the collapse of the ground.

The result is both life and death.

And the Compass brother, although not so quick to make a decision, it seems that the action is not so Thunderbolt thunder, but he is a strategic level master.

He faced the jaybird gallop of the silly Force teammates, in the heart of the lines estimated only one sentence, blind forced to run a yarn ah.

Yes, I want to say to all friends who are diligent and lazy in strategy, run a yarn with a blind force.

As an example,

in planning CRM system function, a customer raised a demand, product manager immediately arranged for development, the program completed a day of product function development and the perfect solution to customer demand, which is called tactical diligence; but the product manager did not consider whether the customer's demand for the popularity of the future market potential is large, Whether there are other simple solutions to meet customer needs, if the continuous increase of similar small functions,theCRM system will become too bloated, hurt the user experience of ordinary users and so on, this is the strategic lazy. This also shows that the product Manager does not have the necessary hard power .

Being lazy in strategy and diligent in tactics is in fact a pattern problem.

For example, Japan is a people with no strategy, such as the Pacific War, in the tactical, Japan can not say that the preparation is not sufficient, Linktek soldiers how to take the bayonet all the detail. And the only thing they don't want to understand is whether or not the battle should be fought?

As a result, Uncle Sam was brutally blown up and the intestines drained.

Therefore, I personally more inclined to think that the success or failure of the strategic level, more depends on the intellectual and intellectual problems caused by the pattern.

This kind of thing is also abound in our real life.

Let's look at an example.

For example, when I was in high school, the class had a buddy, in the liberal arts Division, decided to choose the science, in the next two years of science career, he is like the aforementioned Pacific War in Japan, was the physical, chemical, biological brutal gang raped a happy.

But at the same time I can use the personality guarantee, in the academic, he is more than including me, almost all of the students have paid more, his textbook generally against almost everything, but his college entrance exam is still a crushing defeat.

My buddy, tactically, has done almost everything, but still hasn't been able to gongchenglvede in the college entrance exam because he failed at the strategic level.

He did not want to know whether he should read science or Liberal Arts.

There is also an example of a better interpretation of "tactical diligence to conceal strategic laziness."

This is a typical example of strategic laziness, tactical diligence. A June does not choose mathematics is because it is difficult, obviously know to review mathematics is right, but because it is difficult, it chose the easy road, and then in this easy road of joy Gallop, but also comfort themselves, I am diligent, I am hard, actually forget, Strategic mistakes cannot be redeemed by tactics. Of course she is pretty good, just walked a detour road, many of us in the choice of time, go the exact opposite road, and then use the gallop to disguise their cowardice, with the busy cover up their dismay, and then said to others, Tiandaochouqin, I am not far from success.

In the final analysis, we have to do this: get it, be the position.

The choice of decision makers, the strategy of policy makers, is more important than diligence.

The diligence of the performer, the tactic of the performer, is more important than the choice.

The decision-making position puts more energy into the decision-making strategy.

In the execution of the position, more experience is placed in the current tactics.

remember rebels's words: Don't ever using tactical diligence to conceal strategic laziness .

Don't use tactical diligence to cover up strategic laziness.