External review of Relativity
1. What is light wave?
The light wave is the spiral motion waveform of the optical particles! As long as the light in the instantaneous motion of the particle, actually means that the light wave is the motion waveform of the particles. Physical experiments have shown that light waves have particle properties and fluctuating properties. It says that light particles are also waves, which violate semantic logic and become a shemale. It is impossible to say that light particles are the properties of waves. So, the light particles are the vibrations of the etheric particles that diffuse in space? Or is it a movement of its own? Obviously I think it's the latter. If light is made up of particles, will the particles collide with each other in the process of propagation? If the diameter of light particles is less than 1e-28m, then, it is impossible to easily collide, but the light particles will be with the positive and negative electrons in the material magnetic action.
For the photon motion, the experiment proves that there is angular momentum H1, so, the photon movement has the rotational component, the photon only is the spiral motion, has the frequency, the wavelength, the wave velocity c. The velocity component of the rotation direction and the circumferential direction of the photon Helix motion is the wave velocity C, so the actual velocity of the light particle is √2 c.
Light wave, electromagnetic wave, dielectric wave is not the same thing, do not arbitrarily presstitute! Though they are all waves, there is much in common. If a free-flying photon interacts with a substance in the space P-point, the photon must come up with the corresponding energy and the velocity will be reduced. There is reason to believe that photons on the Earth's vacuum wave speed C will be slightly lower than on the moon, so, I guess in the void away from gravitation, the photon wave velocity c should be: 3E+8 m/S.
If the light of the vacuum wave velocity C is the light particles in the vacuum wave propagation direction of the speed, is the wavelength and frequency of the product, or wavelength except the period, then, it is obvious that the C value and inertial reference frame Independent! And the movement speed of the light source is not off! Of course, with photons as the reference point of origin, except. The relativistic hypothesis about the speed of light C is obviously superfluous!
2. Principle of relativity
The principle of relativity: the physical law has the same form in all inertial systems.
Is this the experience summed up in the macroscopic world of mankind, which is effective for all the laws of physics? When the object is moving at high speed, it is controversial. For the electromagnetic law, if the hypothesis is that there is a specific frame of reference, such as ether or source particles-the electronic frame of reference, then Newton's classic absolute space-time view to be protected. So why do we have to develop a theory of relativity? How do you get so many crooked circles that violate common sense? On the surface is the Lombard 18 bent head mischief, deep-seated I really dare not say! When the test, the college entrance examination, graduate students, Bossen a series of poke growth process (a bit like the clone of Star Wars), many clever because of lack of practice, will only think in the void, fixed thinking will only be the western theory of the follower, I sigh and helpless!
For the argument of relativity principle extension, I don't comment too much, tell a story!
In the distant river system, there is a ship with a diameter of 1 km and a length of 3000 km, flying at 0.1C of light. In the fully enclosed spaceship lives many species of people race, the science and technology level and we are quite, the society mainly divides into 2 big stratum: The laborer, the class. They have realized that the speed of light wave C is the speed at which the photon's helix velocity √2c in the direction of wave propagation. Their students do not violate mathematical knowledge, that the wave velocity C is the highest speed of the universe, although there is also the verdict cat. They set up a 10-metre-long vacuum pipe in the ship's head A to tail B, and the length of the spacecraft is calculated by emitting photons at the end of A and the B-side metering the time of receiving the photon. But the problem arises, in any case, to improve the accuracy of the measurement, from the A-side launch and the launch from the B-end of the time value is not the same! The same distance, the same speed of light C, the time result is not the same; tab ~= 9.1MS,TBA ~= 11ms. Combined with the electromagnetic law discovered at that time, Lorenz transformation was proposed, and later, a love of the study of the theory of relativity. One of the principles of the principle of relativity says: If the coordinate system K ' is uniform motion with respect to the coordinate system k and does not rotate, it is impossible to distinguish which is the coordinate system K and which is the coordinate system k′ in relation to the two coordinate systems in any physical experiment. Those of the clock slow, the scale shrinks, the qualitative increase and so on the argument obtains the profession to push the praise, after the medical proof, the love's head to have a more curved, is Lombard 19 bends. The news, the Society once again uproar, love the people kneel down countless.
Did it really solve the problem? There are many people who oppose the civil branch. What is the reason to say: from A to B will be the length of contraction, time is faster? Or is it from B to a that it grows in length and slows down time? is the universe bound to be built according to the subjective thinking of the students? Later, the experiment of the high-speed movement of π meson proved that the life of π meson was "prolonged". Can this prove relativity? It's nonsense to know that the power of π-meson at high speed is not the same as at low speeds! If the energy is higher, the less likely it is to disintegrate, what can the experiment explain? Later, it was suggested that our universe is not static, there is an absolute frame of reference outside the universe, our universe with a BA vector direction in the forward uniform motion, Tab = L/(C + V), TBA = L/(c-v), the calculated speed V is 0.1C, the spacecraft length L = 3E+6 m; , it can be perfectly explained by classical physics, but this is in phase with the principle of the Relativity of love!
Why did the Michelson-Morey experiment fail? Obviously, it is not possible to use the mirror Ah, the light road is not able to participate in the media! I don't understand the idea of the students because of the simple question.
3. Relativistic mass energy equation e = M c^2 (M is the static mass of the object)
How can we reasonably explain that energetic particles from the universe will have 50J of energy. Think of it, even if the energetic particle from the universe is a large nucleus, even if it contains 100 nuclei; I even if the static mass of the nucleus is 1e-26kg, then, according to the relativistic equation of mass energy: E = 100* 1e-26kg *c^2 ~=9e-8 J, and the actual difference so far, more than 500 million times times, I just can't figure out why so many people believe in relativity. Can the dimensions lie with their eyes open?
4. Relativistic mass-velocity formula: M = M0/(v/c) ^2) ^0.5
If we do not make compensation and other fabricated measures, then the relativistic mass velocity formula completely does not meet the experimental results! When v tends to C, the formula will violate the law of conservation of energy! So, the theory of relativity is completely a fabricated and impractical rubbish! The students do not even know the concept of quality or energy completely, I am a service!
This commentary is I read the novel "Immortal World" Memorial Bar.
Eh, the book of relativity is really boring, look at the beginning of the catalogue, turn over, to the end. More than 200 pages of relativity book is not worth seeing, not 30 minutes. You look at other people's home written by the "Immortal World", write how good ah! I take a breath, a few days and nights ah, see dark faint, darkening ah! Does this level show up? Although they are sci-fi, relativity can only be classified as a low-science fiction! In fact, the "immortal World" can only be regarded as medium work, depth is not enough ah.
I seek truth in the ordinary, in the squalor, in the gloom, in the animal desire, and in the nature. In the fiction of the illusion, I use the eyes of the heart, broken thousands of unreal, through the heavy fog of the galaxy, to reach the edge of the universe, to feel and listen to another universe, what to seek? I don't know! Maybe I'm looking for a lost past.
External review of relativity
